Microsoft doesn't have to do anything, least of all "bend over". There's really no "number 3' competing with Google or Bing, so any decision to not deal with Google benefits Microsoft pretty naturally. Fox has basically said "we want to give money to Microsoft maybe" and Microsoft is all on board that concept. :)

You may note that Microsoft is part of MSNBC, and MSNBC articles continue to appear on news.google.com.

Microsoft doesn't have to do anything, least of all "bend over". There's really no "number 3' competing with Google or Bing, so any decision to not deal with Google benefits Microsoft pretty naturally. Fox has basically said "we want to give money to Microsoft maybe" and Microsoft is all on board that concept. :)


Other way around. Microsoft would be paying Fox to delist from google. :)



You may note that Microsoft is part of MSNBC, and MSNBC articles continue to appear on news.google.com.

That's because the whole "google is stealing our news" dustup is mostly a newscorp/AP thing, not microsoft.

Other way around. Microsoft would be paying Fox to delist from google. :)

This is correct. M$ is trying to buy it's way in to a market dominated by someone else.

Remember, Fox doesn't have a lot of leverage at all. If someone else besides Google competed with Microsoft on search, that'd be different. The payoff is about turning "we want to give money to Microsoft maybe" into "we will give Microsoft money definitely"... not really a "bend over" situation, at least not any worse than the "Bing Cash Back" program.

Indeed, if Fox had any leverage they'd just opt out. As has been pointed out it's trivial to do... but nobody wants to be left out in the cold watching their traffic shrivel up.

One of the strategies google is talking about (http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/placating-publishers-by-limiting-links-a-google-five-click-faq/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+wired/index+(Wired:+Index+3+(Top+Stories+2))) using is already in play at the Financial Times which Mxy linked to a couple posts back. You get x number of free clicks per time period and then you pay after that. FT gives you 2 articles per 30 days. The article goes on to talk about the issues involved in some detail, along with some good related links at the bottom.

Anybody watch Obama at the republican retreat? Very interesting debates. There were some good questions by the repubs, but they were getting schooled so bad by obama that Fox News decided to stop showing his responses and just talk over the feed.

If you don't believe me, watch the last few minutes of Countdown from Friday (the video is up there).

Finally got a chance to watch "Huckabee" tonight. Funniest shit I've ever seen.

All of the applause is canned, cutting off abruptly instead of dying off gradually. Also, cut away shots of the "audience" is 100% fake, since you hear absolutely NO reactions to anything either Huckabee or his guest say during the interview.

You know, just dead silent... like NOBODY IS THERE.

Horrible television.

http://insects.about.com/b/2010/03/11/sean-hannity-bugs-entomologists-belittles-bug-collection.htm

Shocking that a guy named "Tucker" has no clue what he's talking about.

Shocking that a guy named "Tucker" has no clue what he's talking about.

Man, and I thought the bow tie meant he was smart, too!

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/03/24/terrorists-use-explosives-breast-implants-crash-planes-experts-warn/?test=latestnews

Fox is such a joke...don't they know that as of January of last year, terrorists no longer exist?

Apparently Apple (amongst others) are boycotting Glenn Beck.

38

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXSU5d58Otw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y64gknQX7rE

265...that dude is worse than Billy O.

266...is great

Who, Kimmel? He's not bad. He's got some funny bits. Have never seen an entire show though.

265 is certainly more boring than Bill O. Kimmel is better at Late Night than I thought he'd be. Not my favorite guy though.

http://images.nymag.com/news/media/ailes110530_250.jpg

http://nymag.com/news/media/roger-ailes-fox-news-2011-5/

Fox News kicks everyones ASS... AGAIN!

Give it up peeps.

That was a good read Mxy.

Sarah Palin or Tina Fey? Fox News seems confused http://huff.to/mcIR5b

News Corp. hearing suspended after demonstrator attempts to attack Rupert Murdoch while he was being questioned - Sky News

I've got this feeling that Murdoch is going to handle this really cool...maybe even funny.

The science of Fox News?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110725190044.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily+%28ScienceDaily% 3A+Latest+Science+News%29

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foSnAGqhGnE

Glan posting an Ed Shultz clip??? Are you frickin serious?

You are done Glan.

Fox News takes a poll on #occupywallstreet. Bet they weren't expecting this result: http://yfrog.com/o01kd3j

At least Fox puts choices up. The left asked who was to blame for the debt or stalemate or some shit like that and the choices were Obama and the Repubs. LMAO

The left is so transparent.

When did "the left" start doing polls?

Throw me a link when you get a sec, sounds interesting.

^ Just start listening to the news, Glanzie. You filter out left wing bias.

^ Just start listening to the news, Glanzie. You filter out left wing bias.

TRANSLATION:

Don't mind me, I was just talking out of my ass, as usual.

^ Looks like Glanzie had a bad day again. Poor Kristin. Got your tampon stuck or something.

^
Ahh, "The Tahoe"

Naw, I feel great, see ya, LOL!!

If you'd ever get out of your left wing echo chamber, maybe you'd hear some real news instead of asking for links like a bitch.

Stick with MSNBC for your 'news' Kristin. Keep your head in the sand.

LMAO

Yeah, "links" and "facts" are for stupid libs, LOL!!

And just FYI, I would bet that I watch/listen to/read just as much, or more, right wing news as you do.

Hannity, Rush and Fox News every day. Follow tons of neocon talking heads and right wing politicos on twitter. So lol @ your "head in the sand" bullshit. L.O.L.

After all the debt ceiling theatrics that dominated the summer — and the collective sigh of relief at their conclusion (even though the final deal was not a real solution!), it was easiest to forget the federal government was still running on stopgap measures and not an actual budget. Better to forget that than to immediately and wearily wind ourselves up for another heartbreaking round of championing salvific spending cuts only to eventually make painful political concessions that would ultimately shove all meaningful work onto a nebulous future Super Committee.


Update: One last thing — the CNN poll doesn’t even offer Americans the option of blaming Senate Democrats. That’s a little misleading, don’t you think?

If the federal government shuts down, do you think that Barack Obama or the Republicans in
Congress would be more responsible for that?
Sept. 23-25 Mar. 11-13
2011 2011
Obama 33% 37%
Republicans 47% 46%
Both (vol.) 17% 14%
Neither (vol.) 1% 1%
No opinion 2% 2%

Thats the last info I provide for Kristin who keeps her head in the sand with MSNBC.

Do your own work, Son..err daughter!

A link would have been better, but I can see why you wouldn't want to provide that, since you've obviously copied and pasted this from some "other" source.

But we can work with this.

So let's speculate that the same question gets asked with a "Senate Democrats" option, too.

It's obvious to most (but not you or your friends) that Obama and the Senate Dems would split responses, leaving the Republicans with an even larger lead in this poll. Would probably be something like ...

Obama 20%
Senate Democrats 17% (the 37% total between those two)
Republicans 46%

And what do you thing your blogs would have said THEN? The exact opposite to what you are saying now, of course. (Good for you, you're catching on!)

See, you need to learn to think for yourself and not just take what these radical blogs say as "the gospel". Whoops! Poor word choice there, sorry! LOL!!

After all the debt ceiling theatrics that dominated the summer — and the collective sigh of relief at their conclusion (even though the final deal was not a real solution!), it was easiest to forget the federal government was still running on stopgap measures and not an actual budget. Better to forget that than to immediately and wearily wind ourselves up for another heartbreaking round of championing salvific spending cuts only to eventually make painful political concessions that would ultimately shove all meaningful work onto a nebulous future Super Committee.


Update: One last thing — the CNN poll doesn’t even offer Americans the option of blaming Senate Democrats. That’s a little misleading, don’t you think?

If the federal government shuts down, do you think that Barack Obama or the Republicans in
Congress would be more responsible for that?
Sept. 23-25 Mar. 11-13
2011 2011
Obama 33% 37%
Republicans 47% 46%
Both (vol.) 17% 14%
Neither (vol.) 1% 1%
No opinion 2% 2%

And let's just quote that bad boy so it doesn't mysteriously "disappear" later.

GOODNIGHT NOW

And LOL even more if that originally comes from Jack Cafferty.

Another reason that a link would have been better.

But again, I understand why you went this route.

A link would have been better, but I can see why you wouldn't want to provide that, since you've obviously copied and pasted this from some "other" source.

But we can work with this.

So let's speculate that the same question gets asked with a "Senate Democrats" option, too.

It's obvious to most (but not you or your friends) that Obama and the Senate Dems would split responses, leaving the Republicans with an even larger lead in this poll. Would probably be something like ...

Obama 20%
Senate Democrats 17% (the 37% total between those two)
Republicans 46%

And what do you thing your blogs would have said THEN? The exact opposite to what you are saying now, of course. (Good for you, you're catching on!)

See, you need to learn to think for yourself and not just take what these radical blogs say as "the gospel". Whoops! Poor word choice there, sorry! LOL!!

LMAO! What a fuckin douche!

Does the poll include Dems? NO! Is that what I said? YES!

You are such an easy bitch to own Kristin.

What color is the sky in your world?

So nuts.

What color is the sky in your world?

So nuts.

Thats your comeback?

You are done, Son.

Stick to the NBA forum.

Yeah, that's all the energy I feel like spending on this.

I know that I'm the last one that bothers wasting his time with you, but it's getting boring/easy so it won't last much longer.

You'll enjoy talking to yourself, it'll feel just like the Holidays!

Tahoe (and everyone) -

I just made a post and while trying to edit it I accidentally deleted both my new post and the previous post from you. That's never happened before and I apologize. It was something very short about me getting owned. So I'll let you re-post it before I say anything else here in this thread.

When did "the left" start doing polls?

Throw me a link when you get a sec, sounds interesting.

DailyKos pays PPP for polls which have been surprisingly accurate.

They did have a spell where they were paying for polls that turned out to be bullshit.

"The left" was just so (intentionally) nebulous. My point was, an ideology can't commission polls.





(also, sorry for commenting when I planned to hold off for Tahoe, but 12 hours is long enough)

Tahoe (and everyone) -

I just made a post and while trying to edit it I accidentally deleted both my new post and the previous post from you. That's never happened before and I apologize. It was something very short about me getting owned. So I'll let you re-post it before I say anything else here in this thread.

Don't remember right now...post away.

I think it was something like...

WTF TRANSLATION:

I just got owned.

I should not edit posts at 4 am on my little smartphone anymore.

Normally with VBull you can dig it up if its that important. I wouldn't waste my time.

Damn, these 2 chickas on Fox News right now are boneable for sure. Not sure who they are but they don't add to the lol @ Fox one fuckin bit.

Holy shit...the one on the left has some awesome legz and cleavage.

SHE HAS DSL'S TOO.

Who is that? Damn.

This reminds me of the 30 Rock live show where Jane Krakowski pretends to be a Fox News reporter named Blonde.

The least surprising headline in the history of headlines.

Fox News Viewers Know Less Than People Who Don't Watch Any News: Study (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/21/fox-news-viewers-less-informed-people-fairleigh-dickinson_n_1106305.html?ref=mostpopular)

Y8YhED4IgQA

https://tytempletonart.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/under-the-hoodie-websize.jpg?w=500&h=873

http://p.twimg.com/Awe7VteCAAEkD6j.jpg


Fox News was so eager to see the healthcare mandate fail they forgot to read past the 1st page of the ruling

Fox News stuck by their reporting.

"We gave our viewers the news as it happened. When Justice Roberts said, and we read, that the mandate was not valid under the Commerce clause, we reported it. Bill Hemmer even added, be patient as we work through this. Then when we heard and read, that the mandate could be upheld under the government’s power to tax, we reported that as well—all within two minutes.

By contrast, one other cable network was unable to get their Supreme Court reporter to the camera, and said as much. Another said it was a big setback for the President. Fox reported the facts, as they came in."

http://mashable.com/2012/06/28/healthcare-twitter/

Warning -- this isn't especially political, just funny:

http://www.cracked.com/blog/10-baffling-romance-tips-from-sociopaths-at-fox-news/

Just imagine if a legitimate broadcast network did this.

http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2012/08/23/fox-news-defends-revealing-name-of-ex-seal-team-member/

^ Unbelievable!!!!!!! What's next the Prez of the US leaking classified info so he can appear to be strong on defense? Oh....nvm. Already happened.

Obama punks Israel for Talk Like A Pirate Day! LOL!

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/fox-obama-pirate-israel.php?ref=fpnewsfeed

Can't even laugh at this shit:


8:09p.m.: Bill O'Reilly says another reason Romney might lose Ohio, and thus the election is that "50 percent of the people... want stuff." They think Obama will give them free stuff. Latinos, blacks, women, they all want stuff. Obama would have never been reelected by the old establishment. He explicitly makes it a racial thing:

"Obama wins because it's not a traditional America anymore. The white establishment is the minority. People want things."

No that shouldn't be laughed at... arrogance and ignorance of the highest calbire right there

Fuck I love politics though... LOVE IT!

On the one hand you have the sheep convincing themselves that "my vote counts" yet deep down we all know significant change isn't gonna happen because one dude won/lost an election

On the other hand you have the "leaders" of countries saying all the right things when they win/lose yet deep down they know the shit just hit the fan and they were locked in that room!

And somewhere off to the side, out of mind and not even a fucking topic for discussion are the powers that be... comfortable and safe in the knowledge that regardless of the result ain't nothing gonna change

I do love it... particularly the part where milliosn of people convince themselves that "my vote counts". They all COUNT! Your vote counts the same as everyone else's vote... and while it's great you managed to drag your dumb ass down to the polling booth and you somehow managed to fill out the card/paper/whatever in such a way that you didn't fuck it up (no voting for Sheed, Disney, Lebron) at the end of the day The Rock says "It Doesn't Matter Who You Voted For"

Because regardless of who you voted for... shit just got real!

Can't wait to see what happens next

Can't even laugh at this shit:

MSNBC sez crazier shit than that.

WTF?

http://m.motherjones.com/media/2012/11/rove-fox-news-election-results

What a joke these clowns are.

I'm glad that they got to the bottom of it!

WTF?

http://m.motherjones.com/media/2012/11/rove-fox-news-election-results

What a joke these clowns are.

You can make ur case for that but not sure why you say that here.

There was almost 80% of the vote in and only 900 votes seperated the 2 candidates. It wasn't inconceivable for a candidate to make that up, imo. And that call in Ohio put Obama over the top, so he thought some caution was reasonable. The shit you guys come up with sometimes.

But carry on...

Chris Mathews saying he was glad Sandy came in...i could only imagine if a Repub said that.

Ok, this time fer sher, go ahead carry on....

Wasn't referring to Rove, actually. The whole 'let's take a walk down to the decision center and get to the bottom of this' is just odd. It's the kind of thing Letterman would do, but seems really amateurish and out of place during election coverage on a national 'news' network.

There was almost 80% of the vote in and only 900 votes seperated the 2 candidates. It wasn't inconceivable for a candidate to make that up, imo. And that call in Ohio put Obama over the top, so he thought some caution was reasonable. The shit you guys come up with sometimes.
At about the same time, the vote count in Michigan was equally close. I just had a discussion with someone who thought Obama won Michigan only 50-49 because those were the last numbers he saw. I'm glad no one sat around waiting for Detroit votes to come in before calling it for Obama. :)

Colorado and Nevada could've been called at the same time as Ohio, if not sooner, making Ohio moot. The media is so used to Ohio and Florida being these big battlegrounds that they missed out on the real story -- that hispanics in Colorado/Nevada put Obama over the top on election night. Hannity, of all people, is now having a "come to Jesus (pronounced "hey-soose")" moment about immigration.

Wasn't referring to Rove, actually. The whole 'let's take a walk down to the decision center and get to the bottom of this' is just odd. It's the kind of thing Letterman would do, but seems really amateurish and out of place during election coverage on a national 'news' network.

As far as the election coverage goes...IT WAS FUQIN HORRIBLE. I like that Megyn Kelly chick or WHNI, but amateurish is a great way to put it. It took her 5 mins to walk. And one time she said, oh just a second, and said I have to do this...and brushed something off Joe Trippi's coat or something. She really thought she was something.

The coverage would have been great if they were covering Santa Claus coming to NY City or some shit like that. But seriously fucked for an election.

At about the same time, the vote count in Michigan was equally close. I just had a discussion with someone who thought Obama won Michigan only 50-49 because those were the last numbers he saw. I'm glad no one sat around waiting for Detroit votes to come in before calling it for Obama. :)

Colorado and Nevada could've been called at the same time as Ohio, if not sooner, making Ohio moot. The media is so used to Ohio and Florida being these big battlegrounds that they missed out on the real story -- that hispanics in Colorado/Nevada put Obama over the top on election night. Hannity, of all people, is now having a "come to Jesus (pronounced "hey-soose")" moment about immigration.

Well then they shouldn't have called that one either. Even if they got it right.

It was a few years back when the competition between networks to make calls first started fuckin things up. I hope they reverse it. I think someone, if not everyone, called Kerry the winner in 04. I know some of you still think he was but, you get my drift.

In many cases, the Democratic vote comes in last. You live in the worst state for that -- 3+ million uncounted ballots as of today:
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2012-elections/nov-general/pdf/unprocessed-ballots-report.pdf

So I know y'all didn't really care for the electoral college in 04, but should it be changed? I don't think so. I don't really give 2 shits either way, I guess.

http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/electoral-college.jpg

I predicted on twitter on Monday that the Republicans would be talking about changing the system on Wednesday.

I'm really on point lately.

I haven't heard too much chatter about it.

Well, I have.

^ on point.

Oh, you mean my post. gotcha. I couldn't give 2 shits. Thought mxy might have some thoughts.

I actually hope they don't change, I guess. I think the Repubs have only won the popular vote ??? times or some shit. I think its the only way we win elections. With CA and NY having large populations and being liberal, Repubs would need everything else or some shit like that. I know they say the electoral college is population proportional, but not sure about that. Maybe it was when it was set up, but not now???? Not sure.

So I know y'all didn't really care for the electoral college in 04, but should it be changed? I don't think so. I don't really give 2 shits either way, I guess.
In my dream world, everyone votes and the winner is the person who can accumulate a majority of the votes (not just a plurality) wins. I hope such a system would leave to political parties that are more enlightened than "the other party is for it so i must be against it".

One of the big reasons for our current electoral college system is slavery. Fuck that shit.

Why do you guys have the electoral college system anyway?

When was it decided that winning the majority of all votes wasn't the best way to go?

It seems logical that whichever candidate received the most number of votes across the nation was the President.. as opposed to the weird set up you guys have now

The theory originated on the idea that Congress, as direct representatives of their constituents, is elected by popular majority but the Executive (President/Vice President) was less a direct representative of the people and more the head of the collection of states and so would be chosen by the people's representatives (Congress). Before the two party system developed in the U.S., the number of presidential candidates and the regionality of the country (regions of the country somewhat isolated by geography and lack of technology) meant that no one got enough electoral college votes to be president, so Congress made the final decision. This was by design, as the electoral college was seen as a mechanism for winnowing down the candidates to just those acceptable to the people for the Congress to choose from.

The reason it was installed (and I'm sure there are more than one) is because of James Madison's primary fear. Madison was the chief architect of our system of three branches of government that hold each other in check. Madison's primary fear was that if you designed a system that was fully, or just primarily, controlled by a simple majority than the nation would be controlled by mob rule, like the Roman senate was, or oligarchical power (rich people) like the Greek Athenian democracy battled against its entire existence. So they designed a system where representatives chosen by the people determined the two heads of the executive branch, in the hopes that this would both prevent a dictator stirring up public sentiment enough to simply take control (this would be checked by the people's representatives making the final decision) and a powerful wealthy class growing up to incorporate all governmental power within their group (this would be checked by the majority vote of the people being the device that chose the representatives). Thus our system of "representative democracy".

It's dramatically less effective in the current two party system.

Fool and I posted at nearly the same time. :) Besides what Fool said, check out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_%28United_States%29

Basically, the popular vote was a non-starter due to slavery in the southern U.S. The south had a lot of people, but most were slaves. So, deals were made so they would be part of the United States, without unbalancing things. There's other reasons, like Fool said, but slavery was a big boogeyman.

http://dailycurrant.com/2012/11/07/rahm-emanuel-we-fucking-won/

LMAO Vinny - thanks for posting that


"At the moment you're a terrible, cynical human being who gets rich off of other people's ignorance. Your entire existence is defined by intellectual stupor and purposelessness. There's not a single cell of your body that has any redeeming value whatsoever - not even the intestinal cells which host your parasites."

Best!



"I feel deeply sorry for your children and your children's children, who will have to bear the stain of their relationship to you for their entire lives."


Promo!


"I am a dumber, coarser, less centered individual for even haven spoken to you, and I promise I will never repeat that mistake again."

Ever!

Too bad it's fake, lol.

Of course it is... everything is a work... including my post :)

http://www.cracked.com/blog/the-8-greatest-wars-ever-fought-by-fox-news/

"You know the Age of Enlightenment and Reason gave way to moral relativism. And moral relativism is what led us all the way down the dark path to the Holocaust."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/05/03/national_day_of_reason_backlash_penny_nance_blames _the_holocaust_on_reason.html

Is that LOL or Holy Fucking Shit? Maybe LOL because they do that all the time?

I had no idea that Shepard Smith is gay.

always thought he was. Did he come out or something?

I'm with Tahoe on this... could've sworn he was outed a long time ago.
I remember hearing about it when Anderson Cooper came out, maybe?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/31/stephen-colbert-shep-smith-fox-news-deck-candy-crush_n_4182190.html

rl12afrfLD8

I would think Mitt would be honored to have a Lego named after him!

http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/tv/tv-zone-1.811968/fox-host-calls-lego-movie-anti-business-1.6987096

Stacey Dash!

http://michronicleonline.com/2014/05/16/report-stacey-dash-in-talks-to-join-fox-news/

Stacey Dash!

http://michronicleonline.com/2014/05/16/report-stacey-dash-in-talks-to-join-fox-news/

She's so clueless.

http://img13.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-649/loc355/96971_5_355lo.jpg

All you dumb fuckin sheep follow this Odumba blindly.


SMH

I have no problems with sheep.

^ Exactly. And you are one.

Tahoe hates sheep.

What other barnyard animals does he dislike?

I think we may have finally found out something marginally interesting about you.

^ That might be the dumbest post I've ever read on this board.

You wish it was a lie, I bet, LOL.

I'm so conflicted.

http://livefreelivenatural.com/fox-news-anchor-says-good-idea-behead-russell-brand/

For 'hoe


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YF873jIcQKw

^ not bad.

All the news you need to know.

8PgIKAukheo

Why did you do that?

The liberal report/Dem Report/ Fienstein Report whatever you want to call is such a fuckin joke. I seriously laughed when they said the dipshit Libs didn't even interview anyone. LMAO!


you can't make that shit up. But its reality for the Libs.

Merde!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/20/world/europe/fox-news-becomes-unwilling-star-of-french-tv-show.html?_r=0

This happened a week ago or something. You are losing your touch Mxy.

They brought on a douche from years ago and he said some stupid shit. They axed his ass


Unlike Mxys MSNBC who still employ THE reverend Al Sharpton. And all the other hacks.

I don't watch MSNBC. I don't watch cable news, really. I used to like MSNBC online news articles back when MS was involved and the online stuff was handled separately.

Uh oh

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/07/gretchen-carlson-files-lawsuit-against-roger-ailes-alleging-sexual-harassment-225162

Record scratch


In 2004, O’Reilly settled out of court in a case that accused him of “repeatedly engaging in offensive sex talk with [Andrea Mackris, a producer on his show], of having unwanted phone sex with her while using a vibrator on himself, and of describing his fantasies about having sex with her in a shower.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/media/story/2016/07/outfoxed-004650#ixzz4DicsnTMf
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Uh oh

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/07/gretchen-carlson-files-lawsuit-against-roger-ailes-alleging-sexual-harassment-225162

If Woodchuck McBeaver head takes down the source of all slime in the universe I'll send her flowers.

Bill O using a vibrator on himself shouldn't be surprising I guess.

But now I understand why Tahoe is too embarrassed to be here.

Bill O using a vibrator on himself shouldn't be surprising I guess.

Don't kink shame, bro.

^ +1

@GeraldoRivera 4m4 minutes ago
Don't believe the crap about #RogerAiles. Only ones talking dirt are those who hate #FoxNews & want to hurt network that's kicking their ass

Not LOL

http://qz.com/745405/fox-news-omitted-this-moving-speech-by-the-father-of-a-slain-muslim-soldier-from-its-dnc-coverage/

Not LOL

http://qz.com/745405/fox-news-omitted-this-moving-speech-by-the-father-of-a-slain-muslim-soldier-from-its-dnc-coverage/

Cutting out the no-names to make room for the gas bags... nothing to see here.

Publisher HarperCollins said Tuesday that it will stop selling a book by Monica Crowley found to have more than 50 instances of plagiarism.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/10/media/kfile-harper-collins-monica-crowley/index.html

Foreword by Melania?

The New York Times @nytimes
Breaking News: Fox News secretly settled sexual harassment claims against Bill O’Reilly, documents show http://nyti.ms/2i9Ni3D

Ummm

Please retire Billy.

http://liberalplug.com/2017/02/08/fox-news-anchor-just-turned-trump-just-explained-hes-lying-holy-sht-video/

Anyone who watches Fox has been calling to fire this piece of shit. Most hoping Megyn Kelly would take him with her.

New Fox mgmt. hires ... wait for it ... Marie Harf! LMAO! Hilarious. They say its for balance. They renewed Gerdildo Rivera. And fuckin Jehmu Greene is a FoxNews Contributor.

They are just a bunch douches that, for some reason, Fox decides to put on air to bring libs to their station. LOL. Won't work.

They should just let Trump's folks go direct on the air, no anchor or interviewer involved. More safe that way...


Or maybe they can hire this guy??


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NLQuWBmBoE

He goes direct on the Twitter.

Speaking of Fo... Fake News

http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2017/2/26/1637965/-O-Reilly-interviews-fake-Swedish-defense-expert-who-was-arrested-for-assaulting-Texas-police?detail=facebook

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/nyregion/fox-news-sidelines-andrew-napolitano-after-wiretap-allegation.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0&referer=http://m.facebook.com

We had it all, but now it's all slipping away!!!

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/01/hannity-fox-news-237851

Unwanted dick pics now?

Maybe they should launch a football show hosted by Sean Salisbury and Brett Favre!!! LOL!!!

With a name like Balling, probably tea bags were involved.

http://theweek.com/speedreads/761358/fox-news-incredible-obamatrump-hypocrisy-1-damning-video

Damn. Mic drop.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/tomnamako/ralph-peters?utm_term=.vubLvP14WJ#.ybl1mRBO34

https://i.postimg.cc/Y2RyrtmJ/image.jpg