+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: What is the criteria for being a dynasty?

  1. #1
    Done as a dynasty, if that's what some considered them to be
    Which begs the question: What is a dynasty in the NBA?
    Rise like Lions after slumber,
    In unvanquishable number -
    Shake your chains to earth like dew
    Which in sleep had fallen on you -
    Ye are many - they are few.

  2. #2
    Its a lot more than one championship.
    STEW BEEF!

  3. #3
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,906
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Fool
    Its a lot more than one championship.
    That's what is going to be the hardest part of this for me, "what could have been".

    If things had broken just right, we could be looking at a threepeat, with a decent shot at more.
    Find a new slant.

  4. #4
    So does 2 titles = dynasty?

    3? 4? How fucking many?

    Lakers with Shaq and Kobe is called a dynasty by the press, but they now nothing so fuck 'em.

    I wanna know what true fans think a dynasty is.
    Rise like Lions after slumber,
    In unvanquishable number -
    Shake your chains to earth like dew
    Which in sleep had fallen on you -
    Ye are many - they are few.

  5. #5
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,906
    Blog Entries
    2
    My opinion would be two consecutive titles or 3 within 4 years, minimum.
    Find a new slant.

  6. #6
    Thanks GD.

    BTW, is anyone surprised by the big twist?

    All along we were watching thinking we were the Good guys and the Heat were Evil.

    Now it's revealed in the final scenes that we're the Evil fuckers that have no heart or pride.
    Rise like Lions after slumber,
    In unvanquishable number -
    Shake your chains to earth like dew
    Which in sleep had fallen on you -
    Ye are many - they are few.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn
    My opinion would be two consecutive titles or 3 within 4 years, minimum.
    The Rockets were not a Dynasty. Its more than repeating (IMO).
    STEW BEEF!

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Pharaoh
    So does 2 titles = dynasty?

    3? 4? How fucking many?

    Lakers with Shaq and Kobe is called a dynasty by the press, but they now nothing so fuck 'em.

    I wanna know what true fans think a dynasty is.
    The Celtics of the 60's. The Yankees of the 50's. The Oilers and Lakers of the 80's.

    I don't think one team could be considered a "dynasty" unless it can consistently win over an entire decade. I'd say at the minimum 4 titles over ten years, and making it deep into the playoffs most of the remaining six years.

    No, the Pistons are NOT a dynasty. Nor were the Rockets in the mid-90's.

  9. #9
    Dynasty? We're about 4 letters short. We're no more a dynasty than the St. Louis Rams.

  10. #10
    Syndicate Emeritus, Site Co-Founder Taymelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eating children, because I'm republican.
    Posts
    1,368
    I think dynasty can be measured in two ways:

    Current dynasties - so many championships in a few year period - Bulls.

    Historic dynasties - Celtics and their 198,000 championships, Pistons with 3 in 15 years?!?!?!?!, Lakers, etc. Pittsburgh Steelers, etc.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts