Which would you rather have?
Before anyone says it, obviously there's a strong chance the Rams will take one of these guys.
Which would you rather have?
Before anyone says it, obviously there's a strong chance the Rams will take one of these guys.
_
This is an easy question............the answer is Gerald McCoy. McCoy is the more explosive of the two and the one that I think has a higher ceiling. He is not just a flash in the pan like Suh could be. I think Suh might sell more jerseys and could be a bit more marketable, but McCoy is better to build around IMO.
Suh honestly scares me a little bit with his tendency to arm tackle and be too upright at the POA... Don't know if that's going to work in the pros...
Okay, Mel.Originally Posted by FillyCheezeSteak
Anquan Boldin
IMO it comes down to closing speed.. Suh is exactly what you see... McCoy can play side to side and be used in various schemes.
btw, this is not an undersized lineman.. he can play the power game too.... strength can be developed... quickness is another thing.
King Kong Suh
Find a new slant.
If it comes down to these 2, meaning no trade down, I'm switching to Suh.
Players meeting my ASS!
I've been reading about them more lately and it appears to me that McCoy has a higher ceiling (more speed) and that Suh's technique might not work in the NFL as well. I've also heard that McCoy is basically a 3 technique DT (on a 4-3 formation) and Suh might be better suited to play in a 3-4 and play passing downs inside and running downs on the end, so those types of things play in.
Phil Wenneck: The man purse. You actually gonna wear that or are you just fuckin' with me?
Alan Garner: It's where I keep all my things. Get a lot of compliments on this. Plus it's not a purse, it's called a satchel. Indiana Jones wears one.
Gerald McCoy
FillyCheezeSteak, mercury, Tahoe, Train Wreck, WTFchris
Find a new slant.
Bookmarks