http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...lection_stolen
At least, that's the opinion of a quite famous Democrat, and all the overwhelming evidence he brings up.
A snippet:
According to Steven F. Freeman, a visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania who specializes in research methodology, the odds against all three of those shifts occurring in concert are one in 660,000. ''As much as we can say in sound science that something is impossible,'' he says, ''it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote count in the three critical battleground states of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."
Bookmarks