+ Reply to Thread
Page 20 of 31
FirstFirst ... 10 18 19 20 21 22 30 ... LastLast
Results 191 to 200 of 303

Thread: Michigan signs 8 year deal with adidas

  1. #191
    A Great Name Timone's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pescara, Italy
    Posts
    66,243
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn
    Yeah, what do I know? I'm just a "Dad guy".

    I don't know how to relate to the teenage ballers.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=qI0dCVwdedE

  2. #192
    I have that album bitch.

    "And it went a little something like this"
    STEW BEEF!

  3. #193
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn
    That's ADIDAS for you.

    There's a reason that ballers hate that shit.

    You feel me, Knockout?

    LOL.

    "The Forcier is strong with this one." - Boda.

  4. #194
    A Great Name Timone's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pescara, Italy
    Posts
    66,243
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by DrTre11
    Glenn, you are seriously a moron. Yeah, that's what I said. That's exactly the point I was making. You either can't read or you're an idiot.
    Tre by knockout.

  5. #195

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Welcome to Detroit...Oregon. Home to Detroit Lake and nothing else.
    Posts
    881
    This is an interesting thread. Allow me my two cents:

    I go to the University where Phil Knight got his undergraduate degree in business. Phil Knight was a walk-on track athlete whose coach, the late Bill Bowerman, was attempting to pioneer running footwear. His greatest achievement was taking rubber, molding it in waffle irons, and creating light shoes more conducive to better performance. Knight and Bowerman worked out a business deal and, as they say, the rest is truly history...

    The university's legacy is, in many ways, Nike's legacy. Without the university, Nike would not likely have existed, and it goes without saying that Phil Knight has been a generous benefactor in giving back to the school that quite literally gave him everything. His reach on campus has been vast, and many say that the school is in Nike's back pocket. The spirit of innovation and marketing brilliance that has come to define Nike has, in many ways, some of them parallel, come to define the university. I disagree with this notion on the principle that the university in and of itself reaches far beyond any athletic realms, and while our school could do much better in the departmental relations as they pertain to academics and athletics, that is also here nor there.

    The point brought forth is, does a shoe company matter to a college football team? Yes, yes, a million times yes, and you'd better fucking believe it. Our football team currently plays in a 58,000-seat stadium that provides one of the best fan experiences in the country. (Opposing fans...not so much. But the stadium looks nice and gets really loud.) Phil Knight's fingerprints are on most of the athletic department's areas of interest, but none more so than the uniforms. Our football team has uniforms that are widely considered the best in the nation, and in many ways considered the worst. We are a Nike testing ground. People have written ad nauseum about our uniforms, and if they like or hate them.

    You had better believe kids see that. Just this year, we played the University of Washington up in Seattle and wore an all-white uniform: jersey, pants, helmet, socks. The look was raved about up and down. The uniforms themselves mix and match between green, yellow, black and white versions of the helmets, jerseys, pants and socks so much that a football player can go four years without wearing the same uniform combination twice. Mind-blowing. Not to mention, the players PICK which uniform combination they were pre-game.

    We had a junior college running back sign with us, in great part because he liked the uniforms. Who did he tell that to? ESPN. That's right, ESPN. He saw us on TV and liked what he saw, particularly in the uniform department.

    Let's be honest: uniforms are the first thing people notice about a football team. It's how people distinguish between two teams. Nike, in particular, is very adept at creating uniforms so unique (whether they look good or not is in the eye of the beholder) that people don't just recognize them as a school's uniform, but as a NIKE uniform as well. And what does Nike represent to them? Greatness, innovation, cutting-edge work...the Nike brand is so powerful that it can evoke these one-word mental images and exploit them so well. Not saying Nike uniforms are mind-control, but Nike's marketing branch is the most brilliant of its kind in the world because of efforts such as this.

    Which brand of athletic apparel you like has to do with personal preference more than anything. But, when it comes down to who makes Michigan's or MSU's uniforms, does it matter? Yes, yes, YES. It matters. It really does. Is it stupid? Sure, but those who realize that aren't being targeted by Nike. The uniforms are designed to help target the kids who want to play college football. Always have been. Always will be.
    [img]i17.tinypic.com/5z1kqq8.gif[/img]

  6. #196
    Super Cogent Jethro34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Leading the resurgance
    Posts
    4,662
    How often does Oregon pull in a top 10 recruiting class?

    How often does Oregon win championships? Pac-10 or National?

    My point is that Oregon is a blip on the top 25. Is your argument that you would be ranked #60 if it weren't for your uniforms? Because I truly do not see Oregon winning anything noteworthy any time soon, in SPITE of uniforms and an amazing campus. Junior college RB's like your uni's. Congrats. 4 star RB's like the winged helmet and a century of tradition which, coincidentally, does not involve prancing around in fairy uniforms. Keep wearing your all white so opposing teams can get them nice and dirty.

    Yes, I realize Oregon beat the hell out of Michigan last season. I also realize Oregon was crap without Dennis Dixon. But at least he liked the uniforms.
    We had subs. It was crazy.

  7. #197
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    Strong, Jeth.

    I was going to make a similar point, but you made it better.
    Find a new slant.

  8. #198
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    BUT WE'RE BOTH DADS, SO WHAT DO WE KNOW?
    Find a new slant.

  9. #199
    CLEVELAND'S FINEST Zekyl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Faux-Clevelander
    Posts
    9,107
    Phil Knight was in the Oregon chapter of my fraternity.
    _

  10. #200
    Remember when PNF was emo?
    STEW BEEF!

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts