Originally Posted by Glenn
There is a good chance this is the guy, but there are too many holes in the story. What I mean by that he said he raped her, there was no evidence to support rape occured, there was DNA in her underwear however. So either he is a liar or has convinced himself that he did do those things to act like he doesn't have a sexual disfunction of some sorts like most sexual predators profiles say is common.
Next he is claiming it was an accident, the evidence doesn't support that claim in anyway.
The only thing that says he is the guy is him claiming to be ,and the fact he knows something that the media didn't. There are two logical reasons for that first the media and grand jury were privy to a lot of details and the police let stuff slip, so if you can see 99% of a puzzle and a piece or two is missing it isn't that hard to fill in the holes. Sure grand jury stuff is to be sealed but look at Balco, we still found out, this was higher profile and has had as many leaks as Balco. Secondly, the police have been bumbling fools throughout this case talking and revealing too much all along, it isn't unreasonable to assume some jack ass leaked info to somebody who shared it and somehow this guy got the info.
Bookmarks