+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SHOCKER!!! The 2004 election was stolen!!!

  1. #1

    Thumbs down SHOCKER!!! The 2004 election was stolen!!!

    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/sto...lection_stolen

    At least, that's the opinion of a quite famous Democrat, and all the overwhelming evidence he brings up.

    A snippet:

    According to Steven F. Freeman, a visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania who specializes in research methodology, the odds against all three of those shifts occurring in concert are one in 660,000. ''As much as we can say in sound science that something is impossible,'' he says, ''it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote count in the three critical battleground states of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."

  2. #2
    The Healer Black Dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Having an awkward moment just to see how it feels.
    Posts
    9,638
    man voting isnt safe. they'll move to vcomputers and nerds will hack the system and make Nader President.
    ^
    Stalked by a Mod who gives 1 percent credence.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutz Gatsu
    man voting isnt safe. they'll move to vcomputers and nerds will hack the system and make Nader President.
    I don't see an easy way out of reforming the system, either, short of making the process a public display, which will never happen.
    Last edited by TK; 06-05-2006 at 10:41 AM.

  4. #4
    The Healer Black Dynamite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Having an awkward moment just to see how it feels.
    Posts
    9,638
    Quote Originally Posted by TK
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutz Gatsu
    man voting isnt safe. they'll move to vcomputers and nerds will hack the system and make Nader President.
    I don't see an easy way out of reforming the system, either, short of making the process a public displaym which will never happen.
    well you cant fix it. the government has taken the 2 party system to a warfare level. Its "by any means possible" now. the politicians have made their followers just as currupt and full of shit as themselves. back in the day, if you wanted to rig the system there was a level headed boyscout in your way. now if your party runs the state, they rig it for you w/o you even having to send your goons.

    last election young republicans volunteered(for free) to harrass voters and give them a hard time at the polls. feeling that they were protecting their values in the process. but the truth is they were hurting their right to have their own values.
    ^
    Stalked by a Mod who gives 1 percent credence.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Welcome to Detroit...Oregon. Home to Detroit Lake and nothing else.
    Posts
    881
    Quote Originally Posted by TK
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutz Gatsu
    man voting isnt safe. they'll move to vcomputers and nerds will hack the system and make Nader President.
    I don't see an easy way out of reforming the system, either, short of making the process a public display, which will never happen.
    Here in Oregon, all of our ballots are mailed to us and it's all on paper. Nothing's computerized.

    If there were a conforming national system of paper ballots, IMO shit like this wouldn't happen every fucking election.

  6. #6
    Syndicate Emeritus, Site Co-Founder Taymelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eating children, because I'm republican.
    Posts
    1,368

  7. #7
    NOT TO BE FUCKED WITH Uncle Mxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Zrfff
    Posts
    14,929
    Ballots would be stolen out of mailboxes instead.

    Heck, even if you force everyone to vote, a couple % will engage in "donkey voting", voting for items on the ballot at random. (Well, as random as humans get, which means voting for items at the top of the ballot and easiest to vote for -- makes alphabetical sorting a battleground). For any sufficiently close elections, there's enough margin for error where "will of the people" -cannot- be accurately gauged.

    A computer can certainly help augment the voting process, assuming that the voting data collection isn't hosed (broken touchpads, scanners, 3133t hax0rs, etc.). This is just another symptom of identity theft and "national ID card system" debates going on over the world. What's the "most right" balances between privacy, security, integrity, and responsbility? Why can't you assign a name to a child and guarantee that it'll be unique worldwide?

    Applied to voting, would you want your entire voting history in a publically accessible database to guarantee its accuracy relative to your intent? If not publically accessible, to whom would you restrict access to and how? How would you deal with the problem where what you see in the database does not correspond with what you did, especially when such data might already have been spread around into other databases?

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts