Originally Posted by
DE
This is a great moment where observational evidence is just that. And what a better way to show that then use my own (hypocritical?) example. I'm watching the game and I keep thinking I see the pocket collapsing too much on too many plays. I feel that every time Cutler makes a big throw he's had too much time. So I first say that I'm not happy with all of the line-of-scrimmage play. THEN (not first, the smart thing mind you) I start looking at the numbers and getting other people's views on this. So what I emotionally felt watching certain plays is actually not what really happened.
I guess showing myself as guilty of doing the same thing I always argue against either shows the validity of what I'm saying or that I'm just an idiot.
Bookmarks