View Poll Results: Stuck and Jonas for #2

Voters
6. You may not vote on this poll
  • F$#+ Yeah!

    5 83.33%
  • F@$# No!

    1 16.67%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Would you trade Stuckey and Jerebko for the #2 pick?

  1. #1

    Would you trade Stuckey and Jerebko for the #2 pick?

    Justify.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG BEN'S FRO View Post
    Justify.
    I would do this in a second. Stuckey is really a SG and will probably be overpaid now that he is an RFA. We already have enough SGs and his attitude issues were a little alarming. I really like Jerebko but I do not see him ever being more than a "good" player. With the number 2 pick we would have the ability to go out and get a Derrick Wililams or Kanter who would both look really good next to Monroe and have higher ceilings than Jerebko. We could them use the #8 pick on a SF, PG or to trade for a PG or SF. Win-win.

  3. #3
    Almost voted no... but went with yeah cause i'm not confident Stuckey will want to re-sign.
    I'm definitely not in luv with Williams overall game (below avg defender for a sf the position he says he has to play).... we need a lock down defender first.
    I do believe that the 2nd pick could net a nice asset in trade.
    JJ would be tough to lose... at this point we'd be talking about a S&T since we don't own JJ rights.
    Last edited by mercury; 05-27-2011 at 11:31 PM.

  4. #4
    Joe Asberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Gordon, Villa, RIP,Stuckey-who needs defense anyway?
    Posts
    1,321
    Derrick Williams is a tweener, if you could get Irving at 2 asap, but the other guys are not worth it. I expect great things from Jonas next season, he might be better than any of these top 10 rookies from this weak ass draft.

  5. #5
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    Anybody but Monroe or Jerebko.
    Find a new slant.

  6. #6
    What!??!?! Jerebko is at best a 7th man in the league and Stuck is about to be overpaid. Holy shit, I'd give both up for the 10th pick in this lousy draft.

  7. #7
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    I love Jerebko (even as a 6th man) for his versatility, his hustle and attitude. I know that many doubt his talent, but I'm a believer, and in this case I like known over unknown.

    I'd include him if we were talking about Irving, of course, but after Irving, this thing seems like a total crap shoot. Another major setback like giving up JJ for a bust could set us back another 5 years on top of the 3+ that we're already going to suck.
    Find a new slant.

  8. #8
    Giving up a dude who hustles can set us back 5 years? It shouldn't set us back 5 hours. He's no less a tweener than Williams, sans the incredible scoring talents both around the rim and unreal shooting %s outside. He's nothing but fun in part cause he's white.

  9. #9
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    Wow, you really don't like Jerebko.
    Find a new slant.

  10. #10
    NOT TO BE FUCKED WITH Uncle Mxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Zrfff
    Posts
    14,933
    Would you trade Stuckey and #8 for the #2 pick?

    IOW, is Jerebko better than what we could draft at #8?

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts