View Poll Results: Which of these BEST describes how do you feel about Stuckey heading into this season?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • I'm sold, he should be our long term PG

    6 28.57%
  • I'm getting concerned, he hasn't shown the progress that was expected

    11 52.38%
  • I've given up hope that he'll be our long term solution at PG

    4 19.05%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 50
FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 497

Thread: Rodney Stuckey re-assessment

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Glan
    Thank Christ, he's back.

    So you have to wait 3 years to even get concerned?
    Of course not.

    If a guy doesn't show squat in year 1 then obviously I think there is an issue. I wouldn't throw the dude under a bus though.

    If the same guy doesn't show anything in year 2 then things are not looking good and I'd be prepared to field offers for him.

    Stuckey is in a completely different situation.

    He has shown flashes of real talent. He has played pretty well for some periods of time in his first 2 years. I don't think anyone is questioning his talent or skills though.

    I think this topic keeps being discussed because it's pretty clear to some he's not a "PG". The people who do think he's capable of playing "PG" obviously view that position's description differently.

    So you guys go ahead and continue to discuss the "Is he or is he not a PG". I'm just gonna sit back and read it.

    I'm more concerned with how the kid performs this season in whatever position he plays
    Rise like Lions after slumber,
    In unvanquishable number -
    Shake your chains to earth like dew
    Which in sleep had fallen on you -
    Ye are many - they are few.

  2. #22
    He is what we (glan and I) thought he was.

  3. #23
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    Flip Murray?

    Actually, I've been seeing a lot of Stackhouse comparisons.
    Find a new slant.

  4. #24

  5. #25
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    The Stackhouse comparison?

    Yeah, I'm not sure about that one either. Do you have one that you like better?
    Find a new slant.

  6. #26
    I'd like Rod Stickland as a scorer, but he was a great passer as well as penetrator. Stuck puts his head down and you know exactly where he's going. I think Rip is a better passer off the dribble than Stuck. I just don't know another guy like this who plays point:

    He can't shoot 3s
    He doesn't set up teammates
    He gets blown by against quick guards.
    He dribble penetrates and finishes strong using his body.

    That's a 2 guard. It just is. I don't care how tall he is. There is no guy in the league making it with those abilities at that size.

  7. #27
    Ron Mercer. That's it. He made a career out of it. A bit of one at least.

  8. #28
    Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Buxtons are not thieves.
    Posts
    2,904
    Blog Entries
    2
    Hermy is my poster of teh day.
    Find a new slant.

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermy
    I just don't know another guy like this who plays point:

    He can't shoot 3s
    He doesn't set up teammates
    He gets blown by against quick guards.
    He dribble penetrates and finishes strong using his body.

    That's a 2 guard. It just is. I don't care how tall he is. There is no guy in the league making it with those abilities at that size.
    agreed.

  10. #30
    ...so you're saying the difference between him and Chauncey is....he doesnt shoot threes?

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts