to be fair, chauncey, corliss and rip lit us up on occasion before we signed them, so that logic isn't totally flawed.
to be fair, chauncey, corliss and rip lit us up on occasion before we signed them, so that logic isn't totally flawed.
Maybe Joe will go after Scalabrine, Jeff Foster, Boobie Gibson, Kendrick Perkins and the Utah Jazz?
Find a new slant.
I'd take D-Will.
I'd love to have Jeff Foster, but not at his salary.
These days I'm on the David Lee or Okafor (based on rumors that they need to cut salary) bandwagon and have soured on Boozer, but that will probably change in a few days. I really don't know wtf to do honestly.
boozer or millsapp is fine with me as long as we get a shot blocker to go with him.
IMO, if you know without a doubt that you can get said shot blocker, you take the better offensive player, i.e. Boozer.Originally Posted by Kstat
WE ARE ALL WITNESSES
I'd take the guy that can stay on the court. He may not be at the same level offensively, but you can count on him to give you what he has every night, not just 65 games a season.
_
problem is the margin of error might be so small that simply having a guy for the playoffs would be more beneficial than having a slightly lesser talented guy around for 10 more games.
Bookmarks