Originally Posted by
xanadu
That article is a load of shit. it is just a subsidy shift from one group to another. If the govt. hadn't jacked up the costs of medicare by subsidizing private insurance through medicare advantage in the first place, these companies would have had to pay those costs anyways. Businessfolk sure get pissy when their subsidies are taken away. i guess its only socialism if someone else benefits.
Let's take a look at this right wing "brilliance"
This argument is incoherent. Apparently, his company's plan is so shitty that the company could drop the plan, take a $200,000 tax penalty, and increase wages based on the savings. Then, individuals could purchase a better plan "with some potential savings" despite that $200,000 fine and despite the fact that the employer gets a huge tax break for providing insurance, a tax break unavailable to the employees in the individual market.
Seriously, this is the best you can come up with. This isn't my preferred bill, but it is a step in the right direction. The US pays vastly more for health care than any of those "socialist" countries, yet has shitty health outcomes. This suggests to me that we have, in fact, the worst fucking health care system in the developed world dollar for dollar. Anything to standardize and better spread risk in the system should lead to the savings on the whole.
Essentially, most of the arguments are based on companies saving money because health care costs are more than the penalties. So fucking what, are they asking for a bigger penalty? Employees are not going to be pleased if their health care is dropped just because it is cheaper than paying penalties. Hell, if all health care were bought and sold on properly regulated exchanges, i'm sure costs would go down for everyone.