This business with Hillary retroactively committing crimes of leaking classified data is getitng silly.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016...on-emails.html
Translation: the documents weren't obviously classified at the time Hillary had them.
<That is false. The info is either classified or it isn't. Even if its not been 'marked' classified by someone, its still classified info. It doesn't need some banner across the top.
Translation: we classify public information so you can't talk about it even when it's in the public domain, which is ridiculous and not a new problem (e.g. Wikileaks). When something isn't secret anymore, acting as it if were secret is stupid and defies common sense.
And I have Tahoe to thank for staring at this again -- calling Hillary "the criminal" made me look at the most recent news article that news.google.com presented about the situation, rather than ignoring it like I had for months.
Of course, Hillary's probably a crook for other reasons, but that's true of most politicians.
.