So what does all this have to do with last night's game anyway?
Printable View
So what does all this have to do with last night's game anyway?
We don't have a PG and it was evident last night.
As it has been for weeks.
You adding that statement in doesn't change the fact that you were the chief champion of that little fear drive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
Me adding "If Joe think Sheed will die of a heart attack soon" doesn't make it any less dumb for me to propose trades and signings out of fear that he might.
I'm not seeing your point.
Is it that I was contemplating losing Rip for nothing?
Because that is what it should be, without the famous "Fool filter".
And you tried that little trick of comparing "someone dying" as an equivalent to "a free agent leaving his team" before, and it was as weak then as it is now.
It's hard to say we don't have a PG when we don't have any clue on offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
Is that the PG's fault, or is it just bad coaching? If we had any clue on defense, if the rotation was pretty consistent, then maybe I could say that Stuckey isn't playing PG great. Unfortunately there isn't consistency in any phase, so that tells me the coach is clueless.
So did Terry Porter's coaching help Nash get those 21 assists?
If Curry was coaching them everyone would be standing around clueless. There wouldn't have been any pick and rolls with Nash and Amare because Curry is clueless.
Did Porter make Nash a good PG? No, but coaching did help him earlier in his career. What kind of good coaching has Stuckey had in the NBA?
Which is another reason that we need a quality PG capable of running (and initiating/creating, if necessary) an efficient half court offense.Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFchris
29+ minutes with 1 assist ain't cutting it.