http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...0px-Common.jpghttp://blog.taxelimagegroup.com/wp-c...ents_small.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
Printable View
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...0px-Common.jpghttp://blog.taxelimagegroup.com/wp-c...ents_small.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
nice fool.
So do you think that Rip signs that deal if he knows that Chauncey is being traded?
Do you think he signs it today if he didn't then?
Of course he does, right? HE'D NEVER LEAVE US, HE LOVES US
If he didn't, we'd just package him with a big anyway.
Exactly what my point was back then, he might have to be traded so we didn't lose him for nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFchris
You wanted us to pick up or trade for any SG available. We actually did trade for a SG after Rip signed and that is our current rotation problem.
You were terrified of nothing.
Yeah, I think I said exactly that "GET ANY SG AVAILABLE".Quote:
Originally Posted by Fool
Trading for a SG AFTER Rip was re-signed would be considered dumb, if it wasn't for the expiring deal involved.
"Terrfied", lol.
I can haz overdramatization.
You made like half a dozen trade proposals and every SG that was mentioned you said to go after.
That was WHILE you were calling Stuckey a SG. It made zero sense.
Based on the assumption that they were going to play him at PG.
It doesn't matter if I think he's a SG or not if they won't play him there.
I don't have that kind of influence.
And that "half dozen trade proposals" sounds like a bit much, too.
Every SG?
And most (all?) of any Rip trade proposal that I suggested included something like "IF Joe thinks that he might leave, he needs to consider...", IIRC.
Let's try to keep some semblance of intellectual honesty here.