Manu has an expiring deal this year, just about $11m.
Would they move him to re-tool?
Printable View
Manu has an expiring deal this year, just about $11m.
Would they move him to re-tool?
only if they get another tool as big as ManuQuote:
Originally Posted by Gl'enn
I hope to god that Joe doesn't go after Manu, I think I would die.
S&T Sheed for him, lol.
Obviously, short-handed teams being killed in the playoffs = done.
Riiiggghhhttt...
Not quite, but short-handed teams with weak benches that can't answer the call when a starter goes down or gets in foul trouble, maybe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Mxy
Their bench has been highly suspect for two years now, and it finally came back and bit them.
Now they don't have the resources to re-tool without dealing one of the "big 3".
IMO.
Yes, they should have had another Manu on the bench next to the real Manu waiting to "answer the call".
Yeah, that's exactly what I said. You do love to twist my words, don't you?
You can continue to believe that I'm the only one that sees this, but you're living a lie.
And I know you know it, too.
You dismissed his point by saying they should have been able to handle a loss to (at worst) their third best player as though any team could lose a Manu and still challenge for a championship. If I were going to put words into your mouth, I wouldn't make them so dumb.
Even Parker said they would have had a really hard time winning the series with Ginobili.
They're a flawed team, and it finally came home to roost, Ginobili injury or not.
Sorry if you don't like it.
LOL, like I give a shit about whether they are "flawed" or not. I've only ever cared about your argument, not the Spurs themselves. Just like now. I made fun of your "that's why you have benches, to take the place of your all-star" comment. That's what the "volcanoes are done" statement was about.