Printable View
The point is that logic is lost here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taymelo
To make it simple, Darko bashers try to place him below a certain line, supporters try to place him above a certain line. Those lines don't have to be the same, and their projected domains for Darko's image may or may not overlap, but at least each team has some wiggle room.You are trying to place him ON a line. Good luck staying there.
19 minutes|10 points(5-10)|7rebounds|4blocks|2assists|2 fouls|0turnovers|
also should point out that he was on the court when orlando made their run in the 4th. (i also believe he was on the court in the 2nd when they made a push). in fact, it seems that orlando plays their best when darko is on the court.
magic 4-1 in last 5. not bad for a team thats tanking.
weird nobody said "they" were "tanking". i do remember a few people saying one of their players was "tanking" here to force Joe D to trade him. and his work in orlando is proof.Quote:
Originally Posted by b-diddy
right, trading franchise for penny, and then waiving him was clearly a move to get ready for the playoff push.
by 'a few people' are you referring to yourself saying the same thing 3000000000 times?
what are you talking about? are you trying to say that YOU thought they were gonna tank???? Because your reading on my post is all backwards. I NEVER SAID ORLANDO WAS TANKING. sowtf are you talking bout.Quote:
Originally Posted by b-diddy
Penny hardaway was irrelevent as hell. I'm still lost on that. [smilie=arrgh.jpg] Anytime i had to repeat myself on darko tanking while he was here it was because you were to thick headed and blind to believe the obvious. If I had 3000000000 repeats. thats 3000000000 times you didnt get it. and i need to add one more after this crazy post about penny. [smilie=annoyed.gif]
hmmm... maybe i was a little confusing on that, i'll clarify.
the second orlando traded franchise (and then waived the guy they traded him for) was the second they gave up on the season.
orlando was already a bad team. giving away franchise should have made them a team that cant win games. they've won 4 in 5. i'd say theyre overachieving, and darko is a big part of their success.
i disagree, he was a ballhog and grant hill IMO was a better team player. either way teams are better than stars. the major factor in their wins having a pg who can run the offense(arroyo). it gives all their jump shooters a better shot. its odd that you point to darko when its obvious that its arroyo earning his value there. if we just only gave them arroyo they'd be better off than if we just only gave them darko.Quote:
Originally Posted by b-diddy
but to clarify you saw francis leaving as a "give up" move. i saw it as "we have a real pg so we dont need his hogging ass".
I think it's a little bit of both.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rorschach
A stellar night for me last night.
Darko played 12 minutes, had two blocks, no points, and pretty much nothing else.
Darko supporters: He had two blocks in just 12 minutes. He's a freak!
Darko bashers: He had no points, and really not anything else besides two blocks in 12 minutes, and his team lost. He sucks!
Me: See what I'm saying? He's a great shotblocker but mediocre in every other category. He's Shawn Bradley with a few less inches of height.