OGT: Clippers at Pistons (11/27/09)

Quote:

Originally Posted by geerussell

Bynum is fine, the depleted roster is just putting demands on him that he simply doesn't have the game to deliver on.

lol, i knew this post was coming.

They shoulda started his ass so you could point out how he needs to be on the bench too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Koolaid

K-stat is a fucking dumbass.

Bynum just put up 4-17 for 14 points when everybody was out with an injury. He also managed to get 9 ASSISTS with 1 TURNOVER while being the primary ball handler.

funny how when Stuckey put up consecutive 4-15, 6-19, 7-20 and 5-18 games, with everybody except rip and he ain't pass to none of 'em, your ass wasn't saying shit. Now you wanna flip balls cuz Bynum shot poorly.

Cause what you don't mention is the difference in size and defense that Stuckey provides.

Fellas, both sides of the story has merit... hopefully PG is the least of our worries.. can we focus on the lack of production from our bigs?

Jonas!

Really, I'm impressed by his effort. If he stays under control and consistently knocks down the J like he did last night he is going to be solid for us for awhile.

Can Stuckey defend at PG?

Didn't the opposing PG in this game score a ton of points?

If we're talking about Baron Davis, then I know I watched Bynum suck ass hell against him. He was guarding him 'cuz Stuckey got into B.S. foul trouble (it was B.S.). But yeah, I remember Bynum getting schooled often by Davis.

I'm not talking Bynum, though. I'm talking Stuckey.

With BG and Bynum, most of Stuckey defending is at the wing. Last year, I noted that he was a lot better defending at SG than at PG, but I don't know enough about how he's improved defending at PG.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaoh

Cause what you don't mention is the difference in size and defense that Stuckey provides.

I don't mention it for a reason. I really don't care if a pg can guard SFs. I'd much rather have one who can pass the fucking ball.

and your defensive comparisson ain't shit either. They both are good, but they play different games. Stuck plays D like a SG/SF, and Bynum pressures the ball like a PG. It's like comparring Bruce Bowen and Lindsey Hunter.

Um, I wouldn't say both are pretty good.

I'd say Stuckey has proven to be good on certain positions/players while Bynum has not proven to be better than average against anyone.

But don't let that stop you from pimping your boy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaoh

Um, I wouldn't say both are pretty good.

I'd say Stuckey has proven to be good on certain positions/players while Bynum has not proven to be better than average against anyone.

But don't let that stop you from pimping your boy.

so bynum didn't school the fuck out of Jameer Nelson or Raymond Felton now?

You just see whatever the fuck you want huh?