That's understandable, you're the big government guy.
Printable View
That's understandable, you're the big government guy.
^ stupid.
It doesn't take big government. It takes giving authority to tell the bullies and their parents to stop it or they get booted.
Then they bully in the streets. But don't worry, the govt. has a solution to a problem as old as man.
If they are fuckheads, then take them out of society. Its that easy.
Well, checkmate. If you are willing to hand out life sentences to children who taunt, you win.
Gonna be expensive, but that's cool. We'll borrow from China.
The alternative to school administrations being pussies involves our tax dollars paying for legal expenses instead of teaching students. With this kind of ruling, both action and inaction will lead to lawsuits -- ugh.
As laws currenty exist, schools need to hand off such issues fast, not own them. Bullying in particular is increasingly happening beyond school grounds (e.g. cyberbullying) and shouldn't be owned by the schools when it's extends beyond the school. Physical abuse, the rubbing of nekkid parts after being imprisoned, fisticuffs, etc. is criminal behavior, and should be handled as such. Most people will respect the cop with the gun who can put you in juvie more than the principal putting a mark on your permanent record.
LMAO!Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermy
You and they guy in the article should go get your exageration on together.
But didn't you contradict yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Mxy
As long as the districts are going to be sued, then get rid of the bad guys/gals. I think an administrator has a much better chance of winning if they decide to remove the disruption.
Sorry, did you mean kill them? "Take them out of society"? Where are you putting them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe
I didn't know we were ready to write law here.
Let me get a draft and I'll get back to you.
Seriously, just start by taking them out of that school.