I read in SI that Steph Curry wanted to at Davidson another year to make another run at the NCAA Tournament. Obviously a lot could change before the draft.
Printable View
I read in SI that Steph Curry wanted to at Davidson another year to make another run at the NCAA Tournament. Obviously a lot could change before the draft.
Doesn't Curry translate to a 6-1 SG in the NBA? Does he have any PG skills?
DrRay voicing my concerns there. Is he going to be able to get himself an open shot? He's going to be guarded by guys much bigger than he is, and I don't know that he's got the handle to shake someone and get himself that open jumper.
I'd consider this douche Devendorf in the 2nd round. He should be drafted, I think.
He's like Billy Lambs, everyone hates him cept for the team he's playing on. I could see his dumb ass being a Celtic. He can't hit the 3 with a hnd in his face.
He was suspended a couple times though. Not sure what for.
No way, he's a megadouche!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe
Plus, I'm not 100% on this, but I think he hit his girlfriend.
He can beat up a girl? What a tough guy? fuck him.
Someone will take a shot on him, won't they...even with that record?
curry has no pg skills, but will get his own since he's quick with his feet and his shot.
http://www.82games.com/nbadraftpicks.htm has some interesting insights.
Thnx... good stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Mxy
They don't have the ability to factor in defensive contributions (which is always the weak link in statisticle analysis)...
It is useful information for setting folks str8 about the actual impact of a #16 pick (and 2nd rounders)... this is pretty consistent with what USA Today came up with a few years back.
Bottom line is that we can do a lot better by packaging picks to move up or obtaining a PROVEN vet.
Wow!
That research shows we are fucked this coming Draft:
#16 = 11.7
If only we could get the #17 pick - that has a rating of 13.4.
Hell, they should have fucking tried harder so we could have picked #21 (13.1) or #24 (13.0).
In the second round we should trade our picks for any of the following, cause they all have higher ratings than where we're likely to pick:
30 8.9
31 6.8
32 6.6
33 6.0
34 7.6
37 9.6 And naturally we pick #36 and #38. Excuse for Joe already.
40 7.0
41 6.0
43 7.8
45 7.8
Oh, and thanks for the link Mxy:
According to that site only the Knicks (7.7), Houston (7.7) Atlanta Hawks (8.2) have a shittier Draft record than we do from 1989-2008!
http://www.82games.com/bestdraftingteams.htm
Didn't I say our scouts were shit?
Somebody find out who the fuck has worked in the scouting dept in Milwaukee, Phoenix, Lakers, Spurs, Memphis/Vancouver.