[smilie=handjob.gif]
Printable View
[smilie=handjob.gif]
Here's one.
I think we've all read this one over the past week:
How do you think the rest of the Pistons players feel about that sentiment? Does anybody here think that if we had an Earl Watson/Speedy Claxton type backup PG that we would have ZERO chance of winning the title without Chauncey?Quote:
Originally Posted by Numerous Pistons fans of questionable intellect
Do you think that the Spurs would go without a backup to Duncan or Tony Parker for the same reason?
While the logic is flawed, the statement is true. The Pistons win nothing with Speedy Claxton or any other back-up PG forced into starting status.
I don't get this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony
Motown
L.A.
MOLA.
P.S. I don't know if you were being sarcastic. I'm too tired to try and figure that out.
People didn't say that. They said we might as well trade Arroyo because we aren't winning with him anyway. That's different. I supported getting Watson. But we can't win the title with Arroyo as our starting PG IMO. Not unless Miami and SA have similar catastrophic injuries (similar to us losing Billups).Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn
I agree with what you said, but that's not what I think most people were saying.
"Most" were not saying that, but several did, including here.
How can there really be 5 oz. of milk in every Kraft Single?
How come more women don't go commando under their skirts?
Zip - because with most women I wouldn't want them to.