Glenn
06-04-2007, 08:02 PM
Well do ya?
![]() |
|
View Full Version : Do you think we would have beaten Cleveland if we had re-signed Ben Wallace? Glenn 06-04-2007, 08:02 PM Well do ya? Timone 06-04-2007, 08:07 PM Yes, without a doubt in my mind. In 4, 5, 6, or 7 it doesn't matter, Ben was what made teams fear us. Big Swami 06-04-2007, 08:09 PM I'm going to vote no. Ben was a great personality, but he wouldn't have added enough to this team to put them past the Travel Mug. DrRay11 06-04-2007, 08:10 PM Damnit, I knew this thread was inevitable. Glenn == Suck PS: No. Zekyl 06-04-2007, 09:39 PM Not a chance. They killed us on the perimeter. Ben wouldn't have changed enough. Also, I doubt people will take into account how he held back the offense. Did our offense do well in the series? No, but it would have been even worse with Ben in the lineup. Its just how it goes. micknugget 06-04-2007, 10:14 PM I voted no. Ben wouldn't have solved Chauncey's pathetic play. Ben wouldn't have changed Flips poor coaching strategy. Ben wouldn't have helped break us out of our scoring droughts. Realistically he wasn't a big factor when we played against Chicago so why would that change if he was playing for us. This team just needs to make some major changes. We have the pieces to trade and teh GM to get it done. It's just a matter of him willing to break up the core and do it. Uncle Mxy 06-05-2007, 06:31 AM We needed ben-wa balls stuck in the right place moreso than Ben Wallace. WTFchris 06-05-2007, 10:14 AM I voted no but changed my mind. We'd beat them for sure, but not the Spurs. And we'd be worse off in the long run. Ben would have eliminated a lot of those drives by Lebron, and also would have been better on rotation defense (which Webber could not do). Our offense would have struggled (more than it did) though, so you never know. Timone 06-05-2007, 11:32 AM It would've been 4 on 4 since Ben owns Z. yargs 06-05-2007, 11:36 AM We wouldn't have won the cleveland series with ben wallace. Our coach wouldn't have played him in the 4th quarter (as he didn't in 2006 during the playoffs) which means Lebron still would have had his way getting to the tin when it counted. We also still wouldn't have had that scorer to come in and spark things off the bench which means the team would have scored even less. Timone 06-05-2007, 01:51 PM IvSxi0svpV4 This team would have. :( :( :( Fool 06-05-2007, 02:07 PM I am not a fan of the owner of that video. Timone 06-05-2007, 02:28 PM Dope opening video and song though. (not the Black Eyed Peas one) Black Dynamite 06-10-2007, 01:25 AM I think so yes. But can't say I know. It would have nullified Daniel Gibson on defense(less help outs and no drives) and webber's offense wasn't enough to make me think we'd be fucked with Ben out there. The question is does Flip still leave us stagnant on offense? Of course we'd be able to blame Ben for it all over again rather than Flip..lol |
|