View Full Version : Who's #2 Now?
Baker 01-01-2007, 10:02 PM This thread is not an attempt to talk trash, but this is the time to defend myself. I've been attacked for the last 5 months about my NCAA football opinions and those opinions that concern UM. So I just want to jog the memories of those of you who went off on DrTre the past few months. I decided against quotes because after further review there were dozens too many.
DrTre said UM didn't deserve the title game, had their chance.
>UM fans blasted DrTre claiming UM was CLEARLY the #2 team.
DrTre said UM was not the 2nd best team, USC was.
>UM fans blasted DrTre and claimed UM was CLEARY second best to any knowledgeable football fan.
DrTre said USC's defense was the fastest and hardest hitting in the nation.
>UM fans blasted and claimed UM's D was the best in the country.
For 3 years DrTre has made the claim that UM can't win the big one.
>UM fans went off about UM's "greatness."
So the question begs to be answered, WHO IS WEARING THE BLINDERS HERE?
I'll accept apologies through private message, thank you. :)
JickBoy34 01-01-2007, 10:30 PM How can you start a thread with 'this is not a thread to start trash talk', then go out and talk trash? If you want to talk trash, you don't have to do a pre-apology for what you want to say.
Moodini31 01-01-2007, 10:34 PM Pointless trash talking thread that will die soon. Waste of internet space.
Baker 01-01-2007, 10:52 PM How can you start a thread with 'this is not a thread to start trash talk', then go out and talk trash? If you want to talk trash, you don't have to do a pre-apology for what you want to say.
I'm not talking trash. I pointed out every single topic that I was blasted for over the last few months and pointed out the fact that it turns out I wasn't just a biased MSU fan.
I have every right to bring up these points now because 10-12 UM fans here regularly ganged up on me and claimed that I was biased with blinders on. So I just wanted the opportunity to point out the fact that I didn't deserve the bashing I got.
Just because you don't like the content doesn't mean it is trash talk. Trash talk would have included scores, Rose Bowl records, losing streaks, etc. I chose not to go middle school, but I wasn't going to let these topics slide.
Moodini31 01-01-2007, 11:28 PM Just because you don't like the content doesn't mean it is trash talk. Trash talk would have included scores, Rose Bowl records, losing streaks, etc. I chose not to go middle school, but I wasn't going to let these topics slide.
Way to get it in there. Very smooth. Again "not talking trash" but talking trash. You went to middle school. Ridiculous. [smilie=jester.gif]
Zip Goshboots 01-01-2007, 11:47 PM What's wrong with talking "trash"?
Any rational UM fan has seen this since 1970. We should have seen it coming, because Lloyd got bent over by Tressel again, what the FUCK made (me) or anyone think Lloyd was gonna match wits with fucking Pete Carroll?
Tre, talk traysh. UM fans have, for some reason, given a free pass to this classless ass Loyd Carr because he had ONE good year ten years ago.
We're ignoring the deterioration in the program, and the constant failure.
THREE fucking years in a row you close out the season by losing to OSU AND losing the bowl game?
Five of six losses to Tressel?
Hello! Garbage in, garbage out.
detroitsportscity 01-02-2007, 01:19 AM The correct answer is Boise St.
And quit bitching and watch the game again.
Darth Thanatos 01-02-2007, 01:45 AM Talk all the trash you want, Tre. You've dealt with a lot of crap on this board and now it's your turn to gloat. Most of the Michigan fans here can dish it but can't take it.
Baker 01-02-2007, 02:23 AM Talk all the trash you want, Tre. You've dealt with a lot of crap on this board and now it's your turn to gloat. Most of the Michigan fans here can dish it but can't take it.
thanks bro, and that's all I'm saying. I'm really not trying to pour salt in the wounds and talk trash though. That's not my style because I don't like when its done to me.
However, like you said, I took tons of shit for my opinions and I just wanted to point out that I wasn't the one with blinders.
Baker 01-02-2007, 02:37 AM Way to get it in there. Very smooth. Again "not talking trash" but talking trash. You went to middle school. Ridiculous. [smilie=jester.gif]
You're lucky I went so easy. This is the stuff I was getting from the UM faithful, Moodini feel free to comment on this one (notice your post was directly aimed at me):
Moodini31 wrote: OK Tre, slow down and take the blinders off.
You say USC's defense is the fastest and the hardest hitting D you've seen all year? Did you see Michigan's defense this year? Did you see the hits that David Harris was putting on people? Did you see how many QB's Michigan knocked out of games? Let's compare the 2 teams vs. ND. Quinn went for 274 and 3 TD's and 0 Int's vs. USC. Vs. Michigan he had 234, 3 TD's, 3 Int's, (one for a touchdown), lost a fumble (that was returned for a TD) and was getting up off the turf (often stuck in his facemask) after every time he dropped back to pass.
Let's compare the 2 teams that have the most legitamate case to play the Bucks. USC lost to an unranked Oregon State team, and beat Notre Dame by 20 at home. Michigan lost to #1 Ohio State on the road by 3 points, and beat Notre Dame by 26 on the road. Who do you think is #2? I think it's pretty obvious.
I think I was pretty easy on ya, there were many more more worse than this one and once again directed at me, claimed I had blinders on, and ripped my opinions.
JickBoy34 01-02-2007, 07:40 AM Who said you couldn't talk trash? That is what you are doing in this thread, but for some reason you want to convince yourself that you aren't. No idea why.
WTFchris 01-02-2007, 09:00 AM I agree with JickBoy. How can you say this is not trash talking and then trash talk like that? That is weak. If you want to trash talk, then do it, I don't care. But don't lie about it. Just admit you are trash talking. And don't call the thread "who is #2" like it is a real discussion about USC/Boise/whoever when you know it is not. Clearly any real discussion about #2 would come after the title game. But you chose to bring it up now because you ARE trash talking.
defrocked 01-02-2007, 09:46 AM Agreed on all counts. Go ahead and talk trash. U of M fans do 11 months out of the year. The 1 month of quiet is set aside for after all the big games they blow. If they can't take it in, they shouldn't try to dish it out.
To get on topic with the subject title, I've gotta say USC right now. Boise St is impressive, but there's no way you can put them there. Just can't. If Florida wins, maybe Ohio St gets #2.
Glenn 01-02-2007, 10:42 AM Tre can talk all the trash he wants to, at the end of the day, he's a jealous MSU football fan with a big time little brother syndrome.
Can't talk your way out of that one.
this dr. tre dude may be the worst poster in the history of message boards and that history includes cowology.
Jethro34 01-02-2007, 03:37 PM My only question was whether to move this to the stands or the terrordome.
Tre, bro, you know better. Talk all the shit you want, but this was blatantly juvenile. Come at it, stick it to the other teams fans, fine. But there isn't a bigger lie in the world.
Seriously, a thread to defend yourself? Have fools like cccsdad made you go to that point?
Baker 01-02-2007, 04:31 PM My only question was whether to move this to the stands or the terrordome.
Tre, bro, you know better. Talk all the shit you want, but this was blatantly juvenile. Come at it, stick it to the other teams fans, fine. But there isn't a bigger lie in the world.
Seriously, a thread to defend yourself? Have fools like cccsdad made you go to that point?
You moved this thread because you didn't like what it said and that's it. We've had "my apology" threads that weren't moved, but you moved this one. That's a joke! If you don't like it, don't read it.
MoTown 01-02-2007, 04:51 PM That's a joke!!!
WTFchris 01-02-2007, 05:02 PM People didn't like what you said because you flat out lied. The post had nothing to do with a discussion of what team is #2 and solely was trash talking. If you want to trash talk, by all means. But your initial post and thread title were misleading to say the least, so I don't have much sympathy for you Tre.
Baker 01-02-2007, 05:09 PM People didn't like what you said because you flat out lied. The post had nothing to do with a discussion of what team is #2 and solely was trash talking. If you want to trash talk, by all means. But your initial post and thread title were misleading to say the least, so I don't have much sympathy for you Tre.
Lied? Are you kidding me? I said that it wasn't trash talk because I viewed it as an "I TOLD YOU SO" post. Not a post to rub in the loss to USC. It was a post intended to bring up past subjects that I was ripped for and gloat a bit. The only thing in my thread that I viewed as trash talk was the title, "Who's #2 now" That title was directed to all UM fans that blasted me.
But to play devil's advocate, let's say the thread was trash talk. WHO GIVES A FUCK?! Do we need to discuss whether or not the thread falls under the catagory of trash talk. Damn! Give me a break. Let's say it is. It's a message board, that's what you do. Let's say its not, who cares. Let's say my opening line was "THIS IS ABSOLUTELY AND POSITIVELY NOT TRASH TALk" and then I followed it with 8 paragraphs ripping UM. WHO CARES!
Glenn 01-03-2007, 09:41 AM It seems to me that you have a problem with people ripping on you, Tre. I find it hard to believe that you are really that fragile/sensitive.
I've got news for you. Everyone here gets ripped on because of their opinions, and many times, when proven correct in the end, they might even make a funny post about it or a simple "see, I was right" comment.
But certainly not a whole thread (complete with misleading title) consisting of a veiled "I told you so" rant. Why did this have to be such a production? This deserved to get swatted based on the title/first post content alone.
If you want to talk trash, don't disguise it as a legit discussion topic, start a thread called "I was right, all UM fans can suck it" or something in the Terrordome. If you want to flame UM fans, that's what that forum is for.
Just some constructive feedback for you, do with it what you will.
WTFchris 01-03-2007, 09:49 AM The point is that you twice said it wasn't trash talking and everyone else thought it was. It doesn't matter if you trash talk, just admit you were. How is saying "I told you so" about a program not being as good NOT viewed as trash talking?
Most times when people preface something they are about to say...they are wrong. Like when people say "I'm not a racist, but..." Usually they are in fact racist. not one person had a problem with you ripping the program...you've taken your lumps with MSU. Just don't try and fool anyone. Anyway, this isn't my debate (the whole MSU vs U of M thing), so I am done with this thread.
Glenn 01-03-2007, 09:52 AM It seems to me that you have a problem with people ripping on you, Tre. I find it hard to believe that you are really that fragile/sensitive.
I've got news for you. Everyone here gets ripped on because of their opinions, and many times, when proven correct in the end, they might even make a funny post about it or a simple "see, I was right" comment.
But certainly not a whole thread (complete with misleading title) consisting of a veiled "I told you so" rant. Why did this have to be such a production? This deserved to get swatted based on the title/first post content alone.
If you want to talk trash, don't disguise it as a legit discussion topic, start a thread called "I was right, all UM fans can suck it" or something in the Terrordome. If you want to flame UM fans, that's what that forum is for.
Just some constructive feedback for you, do with it what you will.
Stay tuned for my "SEE, I WAS RIGHT!! MIKE FRATELLO WAS THE FIRST COACH FIRED AFTER ALL" thread in the NBA forum.
Wait, maybe I should call it "Where is Fratello now?"
"Who is the Grizzlies' next savior?"
Glenn 01-03-2007, 10:27 AM ha ha
Maybe we should just add a "see, I told you so" forum.
|
|