WTFDetroit.com

View Full Version : Can anybody explain ANY of this...?



DennyMcLain
11-25-2006, 11:17 AM
First Test, Brisbane, day three (close): Australia 602-9 dec & 181-1 v England 157
By Paul Grunill
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/999999.gif

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42356000/jpg/_42356310_mcgrath_langer270.jpg
McGrath took five wickets or more in an innings for the 29th time


Australia turned the screw in the first Ashes Test by building a lead of 626 after Glenn McGrath took 6-50 to dismiss England for 157 in Brisbane.
The home side opted not to enforce the the follow-on despite England trailing by 445 on first innings.
And Justin Langer (88) and Ricky Ponting (51) shared an unbroken stand of 113 to see them to 181-1 at stumps.
McGrath bowled superbly earlier in the day with only Ian Bell (50) offering prolonged resistance for England.

He hung on grimly for almost four hours before falling to Stuart Clark, who supported McGrath well for figures of 3-21.
Ashley Giles was the only other England batsman to pass 20 and when he was the last man out most people in the ground thought the follow-on decision was a formality.
Not so Ponting, who was clearly intent on grinding England into the turf.
Initially, it looked like Australia were in a hurry to put the tourists in again before the close as Hayden smashed three successive balls from Jimmy Anderson to the boundary.


But the big left-hander gave his wicket away on 38 when he attempted a risky second run to Anderson at fine leg and was beaten by his throw to keeper Geraint Jones.
After that the game meandered along, prompting many spectators to head home early, as Langer coasted to his second half century of the match and Ponting knocked off a couple of personal milestones - 1,000 runs in the calendar year and 9,000 in Test cricket.
England's attack looked toothless but at least Steve Harmison's radar was more reliable than in the first innings, although he had to wait until the 13th over of the innings to be handed the ball.
Australia produced a typically ruthless performance in the field earlier in the day after McGrath and Brett Lee set the tone by bowling unchanged through the first hour and conceding only 30 runs from 13 high quality overs.
Pietersen was dropped by Stuart Clark at long-on when he top edged an attempted pull but McGrath's frustration soon turned to celebration when he won an lbw decision to send him on his way for 16.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42356000/jpg/_42356230_flintoff_out203.jpg
Flintoff looks back to see Adam Gilchrist take the catch


The England batsman did himself no favours by shouldering arms but TV replays suggested he was unlucky with the ball apparently going on to miss off-stump.
Flintoff poked uncertainly at his first ball without making contact, but there was no doubt about the edge from the third he faced which gave Adam Gilchrist a straightforward catch behind the stumps and Brett Lee his only wicket.
There was a moment of hilarity for some members of the crowd as a sweep from Geraint Jones felled umpire Bowden at square leg, striking him on the hip as he tried to turn his back on the ball.
England were 118-5 at lunch but were soon in the mire again as McGrath pinned Jones (19) on the back foot and won another lbw decision.
Bell reached his half century off 155 balls with a nudged single but then sliced the first delivery of a new spell from Clark to Ponting at slip.
Matthew Hoggard and Steve Harmison were both caught behind without troubling the scorer and England's innings came to an end when Giles (24) skied McGrath to Hayden at gully.

JickBoy34
11-25-2006, 11:29 AM
that was a funny read

DennyMcLain
11-25-2006, 05:40 PM
that was a funny read

I don't care about how funny it is... WHAT THE HOLY HELL DOES IT MEAN????[smilie=Francis]

JickBoy34
11-25-2006, 06:30 PM
not a fuckin clue, but it sure was funny

UxKa
11-25-2006, 10:42 PM
Thats worse than trying to understand curling, or anything at that.

DennyMcLain
11-26-2006, 03:30 AM
Where's Pharaoah when we need him the most???

Fool
11-27-2006, 09:45 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket

From what I can tell, there are 10 outs an inning and 6 innings.


The length of the game — certain test matches can last six or more hours a day, for up to five days ~WTF? — the many for lunch and tea and the abundance of specialised terminology are notable aspects that can often confuse those not familiar with the cricket.

Black Dynamite
11-28-2006, 07:48 PM
this is a special game.

H1Man
11-28-2006, 09:50 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket

From what I can tell, there are 10 outs an inning and 6 innings.

There are 10 outs a inning but not 6 innings.

There are two types of games: one day matches and test matches.

Test matches usually last 5-6 days and each team gets to bat twice. This is where you see teams scoring 300+ runs on a routine basis.

In a one-day match, teams bat only once and there is a limit on how long they can bat for, usually 10 wickets (outs) or 50 overs (an over is 6 pitches).

DennyMcLain
11-29-2006, 02:43 AM
Thank you H1Man... my head just 'sploded.

WHAT IN THE HOLY HELL DID YOU JUST SAY????????????

Damn English. They let Argentina beat up on them, and now this.

Fool
11-29-2006, 09:10 AM
What is the significance of the two types of games? Do "test" matches not count or are they like regular season or something?

H1Man
11-30-2006, 10:24 PM
What is the significance of the two types of games? Do "test" matches not count or are they like regular season or something?

Usually teams play more one days matches than they do test matches. But they both count. There are different standings for each and teams often change their rosters depending on if they are playing tests or one-days.

It's almost like having two simultaneous regular seasons.

Fool
12-01-2006, 09:20 AM
Weird.