WTFDetroit.com

View Full Version : OGT: Bucks at Pistons (12/4/09, 8 pm)



Glenn
12-04-2009, 01:44 PM
Charlie's back and Skiles is out http://bit.ly/5ZEYsO

Timone
12-04-2009, 01:51 PM
Charlie's back and Skiles is out http://bit.ly/5ZEYsO


Thank God!!

Glenn
12-04-2009, 04:26 PM
It's been a while since I've been able to say this but, we should win this one.

Timone
12-04-2009, 06:32 PM
This is excellent. Pee-wee's Big Adventure is on and ends exactly at 8.

Hermy
12-04-2009, 06:41 PM
Jennings has already lit bynum up dipshits

Glenn
12-04-2009, 07:43 PM
Best two posts of the day right there.

Timone
12-04-2009, 08:04 PM
Mickey's back in the studio, bitches!!!

Glenn
12-04-2009, 08:09 PM
For a minute there, I thought you meant Mickey from Pee Wee.

Timone
12-04-2009, 08:26 PM
Nice job by Chucky.

Timone
12-04-2009, 08:26 PM
For a minute there, I thought you meant Mickey from Pee Wee.

I think he's in the slammer right now.

Timone
12-04-2009, 08:56 PM
I'm falling asleep so I haven't been able to pay much attention, but I assume Bynum's getting torched.

Tahoe
12-04-2009, 09:01 PM
I'm falling asleep so I haven't been able to pay much attention, but I assume Bynum's getting torched.

+1

Glenn
12-04-2009, 09:01 PM
Anyone that passes the ball to Kwame Brown in the post should be benched immediately.

Glenn
12-04-2009, 09:14 PM
I'm gonna stop ripping Stuckey for not being able to finish at the rim, those cleanup putbacks are some of our best sources for offense. I know that Max and Big Ben love them.

Glenn
12-04-2009, 09:15 PM
Glad I picked up Delfino for my fantasy team yesterday, lol.

Tahoe
12-04-2009, 09:15 PM
I'm gonna stop ripping Stuckey for not being able to finish at the rim, those cleanup putbacks are some of our best sources for offense. I know that Max and Big Ben love them.

Its Dec 4th, not April 1.

Uncle Mxy
12-04-2009, 09:19 PM
Of course, Max is on route to a double-double in points and turnovers. :/

Tahoe
12-04-2009, 09:29 PM
Mick done caught me up

Glenn
12-04-2009, 09:41 PM
Ben is an OFFENSIVE JUGGERNAUT

Tahoe
12-04-2009, 09:54 PM
^ that

Kstat
12-04-2009, 10:20 PM
Charlie V reminds me a lot of Mark Aguirre. Not real athletic or real fast, but he's big, has a solid handle, a plethora of post moves and an excellent shooting touch.

Glenn
12-04-2009, 10:42 PM
Turnovers galore, but a win is a win. We can't really afford to nitpick.

Big Ben was great.

Glenn
12-04-2009, 10:44 PM
Celebrating with a Melatonin cocktail.

Tahoe
12-04-2009, 11:02 PM
Charlie V reminds me a lil bit of Mark Aguirre. Not real athletic or real fast, but he's big, has a solid handle, a plethora of post moves and an excellent shooting touch.

MA pushed peeps around

Hermy
12-05-2009, 06:59 AM
Stuck looked mature, ben looked young. Fun game for the first 3 quarters.

Pharaoh
12-05-2009, 07:49 AM
And only one positive post about Stuckey!

Just goes to show the boxscore MUST lie cause according to it he was our best player.

Shot 7-11!!! Rebounded, dished the rock, didn't jack up any 3's.

And only 1 person mentioned him.

LMMFAO

Glenn
12-05-2009, 08:20 AM
He played very well at times and not very well at times, too.

So is that how we should measure things these days? If stuckey gets praise, it's a win?

Maybe we should go through the whole roster and give thumbs up and thumbs down to each player?

It seemed like we were getting past the whole "it's all about stuckey" phase over the past week or so, but let's get it on.

Pharaoh
12-05-2009, 08:39 AM
You got over it cause I was absent for 3 days (might have to be gone for a few more cause my pc went all fucked up and I'm gonna need to get someone to check it out I think)

Anyway, NO it's not all about Stuckey BUT

I saw the boxscore and thought, "WOW - Kid actually had another good game. This move off the ball is gonna blow up in Joe's face."

So I came here expecting certain people to be all over this.

But whatever man - I don't give a fuck. I know he's not a PG. Him playing well when he ain't at PG just makes me right.

Oh, and for the record if he manages to play well at times according to you then that must mean dude had a pretty good game lol

Glenn
12-05-2009, 09:09 AM
I'm sure that you can see in the box score that we had something like 28 assists (and 20+ turnovers too, I think, I haven't had a chance to analyze the box yet) and that was largely due to some of the best player movement that I've seen from the Pistons in a long time. Hell, even Big Ben was cutting to the hoop like a mofo and was getting easy hoops/dunks out of it. Most of the turnovers came from our stone handed bigs losing the ball on entry passes and from Stuckey doing his bull in a china shop thing and just barrelling dudes over with the ball (he had at least 3 offensive fouls that I can recall off hand).

So yeah, there was lots of good things and lots of not so good things, but the win tips it into the favor of GOOD. If we could play the likes of the Bucks every night, we might be onto something.

Wizzle
12-05-2009, 09:40 AM
I got treated to a suite for this game. It was the first time I've been in one of those and it was impressive. Free food and beer equals a win. It was sad to see how empty the place was.....I'm guessing we won't be adding 2009-10 to the attendance banner. And I know this might be blasphemy, but Mason is starting to wear on me.

As for the game.....I think this was the Bucks being not very good more than anything. Delphino looked like he would keep it interesting but then they'd sit him for long stretches and Jennings has the looks of a great player but his shot is a bit broke. The Pistons are who we thought they were.....too many guards and a few big guys that have too many flaws. I still love Ben though, he still brings the place to their feet. Oh and Gordon had to be told where to be on offense just about every time down the court....don't really know what the deal was there. Overall though, it was great to get back and see a win.

Fool
12-07-2009, 12:30 PM
zdj-slXDZyQ