Some guys I talk hoops with are throwing this article at me as evidence that Stockton was a better player than Isiah. I call bullshit.

http://pacersdigest.com/showthread.php?t=48683&page=2


Stock vs. Isiah

by Neil Paine on December 5, 2008

One of my favorite things to do when looking at old basketball stats is to compare players with different reputations and see if perception agrees with reality. Sometimes, it does — any way you cut it, Michael Jordan was miles better than contemporaries like Dominique Wilkins or Clyde Drexler. Other times, though, it’s not so clear-cut — I present to you the case of Isiah Thomas v. John Stockton.

When they sit down to rank the “best point guards” or what have you, most people place Thomas slightly ahead of Stockton, primarily citing Isiah’s 2 championships (against Stockton’s zero) as the ringleader of the Detroit Pistons’ “Bad Boys” of the late 1980s. It seems to make sense, right? I mean, Thomas was brash and cocky, an in-your-face competitor who grabbed the spotlight in the game’s biggest moments; conversely, Stockton was unassuming and deferential, sometimes viewed as merely a cog (along with Karl Malone) in Jazz coach Jerry Sloan’s pick-n-roll machine. So on the face of it, it looks pretty obvious that Thomas’ career was superior to that of Stockton.

I’m here to challenge that assumption, however.

Don’t get me wrong, Isiah Thomas was a great player. He earned first- or second-team All-NBA honors 5 times, led the league in assists twice, and had many indelible moments in the crucible of the playoffs (remember his MVP performance in the 1990 Finals, or his 25 3rd-quarter points on a badly sprained ankle in Game 6 of the ‘88 Finals?). In fact, in the postseason — when most players’ numbers decline due to the increased strength of opponent — Isiah’s numbers actually improved markedly, from 6.78 career regular-season WS/3000 min. to 8.68 in the playoffs. Face it, the man was tough, and he was one of the clutchest scorers in NBA history.

But why is it a foregone conclusion that his body of work outpaces that of Stockton? Stockton led the league in assists 9 times in a row from 1988-1996. With 15,806 career helpers, he’s easily the league’s all-time leader — he has almost 5,500 more than runner-up Mark Jackson. Eight times he was 1st- or 2nd-team All-NBA. He made the All-Defensive team 5 times; he led the league in steals twice. In a rarity for a guard, his career FG% was .515 (by comparison, Thomas’ was .452). He missed out on the mythical 20,000-point club by a mere 289 points. Perhaps Stockton’s most amazing trait, though, was his durability: while Thomas played 979 career games and was oft-injured late in his 13-year career, Stockton suited up for 1,504 contests (3rd all-time) and missed only 22 games in 19 seasons!

You probably came here for the advanced statistical point of view, though, so here it is: Stockton had 205.4 career Win Shares (3rd all-time) in 19 years, for an average of 10.8 per season; per 3000 minutes, Stockton generated 12.9 wins for the Jazz over the course of his career. Eight times he finished in the league’s top 5 in Win Shares, his career offensive rating of 120.5 (which he accomplished while taking on 21.9% of Utah’s possessions when on the floor) ranks 4th in NBA history, and he had a career DRtg of 104.0 in an era where the league’s average was 106.7. By contrast, Thomas’s 80.3 career Win Shares ranks 88th all-time, and he averaged 6.2 per season; his career WS/3000 min. mark is 6.8. Only once (1984-85) did Isiah finish in the top 5 in WS, and he had a career ORtg of 106.3 and a DRtg of 106.8 in an era where the league’s average was 107.5. The only facets of the game where Isiah was superior to Stockton were his shot-creating ability (Thomas did take on 26.5% of Detroit’s possessions while on the court) and his rebounding (Thomas’ 5.3 career rebound rate is marginally better than Stockton’s 5.0), but in every other area — TS%, assist ratio, steal rate, etc. — Stockton kills Isiah in terms of regular-season numbers.

Oh, but what about the playoffs? After all, that’s where Isiah really made his money (and Stockton always failed)… right? Um, not quite. Stockton had 21.2 career playoff Win Shares; Thomas had 12.2. Stockton’s career playoff WS/3K rate: 9.94; Thomas’ rate: 8.68. Turns out that in the playoffs, it’s the same story as above: Isiah is superior in shot-creation and rebounding, but fails to outpace Stockton on the shooting, passing, and defensive fronts.

So why do people almost universally consider Thomas to be better than Stockton when they give their all-time point guard rankings? Stockton was more durable, more consistent, a better pure PG, more productive (both cumulatively and on a per-minute basis), and was even better in the playoffs, where Stock played a remarkable 182 career games. It is true that the Jazz never won an NBA crown with Stockton at the helm. It is also true that Isiah led Detroit to 2 rings. But hey, Robert Horry has 7 career rings, and no one is suggesting he’s better than Karl Malone. In other words, in light of the overwhelming evidence I’ve laid out above, isn’t it about time we reconsider the Stockton-Thomas debate?

Stockton was a better passer. Thomas was a better winner. Both had talented teams and played in the same era, so you can fairly compare winning vs not winning it all.

With 15,806 career helpers, he’s easily the league’s all-time leader — he has almost 5,500 more than runner-up Mark Jackson.

================================================== =

That Mark Jackson is 2nd in the category you highlight (as if anyone reading that doesn't know who the leader in asst. is) tells me all I need. Stockton generated a shit ton of stats, no doubt, but he always had the ball in his hands feeding Malone and his shooters for quick shots. Isiah played off the ball at times with Joe, and gave it up to Dantley in spots where Adrian went to work on his own, depriving him of dimes.

Zeke was much more of a complete and dominant player not to mention he won titles at each level of basketball competition he faced.

Zeke, if need be, could go off for 40 points if that's what was called upon to win the game. Stockton was not skilled enough to do this. Stockton was a very efficient shooter but he also knew his limitations (which also made him a really nice regular season player).

Zeke also held the NBA record for most APG at 13.9 (until stockton broke it) so he also could have been a play-maker/ball-handling/passer if need be without ever really playing with a dominant big man like Karl Malone who was on the receiving end of 20+ shots a game.

And no matter how many people like to call john stockton a good defender those are people that have never seen him play but rather look at how many steals he had (the steals stat has never been a true indication of defensive ability but rather indicates a guy that likes to take chances on defense).

He was definitely a below-average individual defender which played a large role as to why the jazz never really advanced that far in the playoffs and never won a championship. He simply could not keep guys out of the lane and instead relied on his help defense (which made him and his team a not-so-good playoff club).

Thomas for a small dude was very physical and a much better athlete than people think. He could defend the point. He would also surprise you every now and then with a serious throwdown that was completely unexpected.

This actually really isn't a debate. Zeke is a better player. Win shares my ass.

Stockton would've given up his left nut for Isiah's career.
Isiah would not have given up his left nut for Stockton's.

Stockton would've given up his left nut for Isiah's career.

And with those shorts, we would have seen it all with our own eyes.

stockton was great. for a long long time. but i still maintain isiah was the better player. i don't care about stats, i care about head to head and about versatility. sure stockton could do a lot and was an incredible leader and director. but could he will his team to a win like zeke could?

i don't buy that a PG is just to handle the ball and set up his teammates which is why i think isiah is better overall. he COULD facilitate and simply play distributor if he wanted too. however he was so talented and versatile offensively that he could not simply be relegated to that role. it would've been a waste of his talent.

obviously the offense each team ran and the teammates surrounding each guy affected their style a bit too. but i watch the way zeke used to torch stockton in head to heads- especially after the olympic snub. not having isiah on that dream team is still a travesty IMO.

stockton is probably the greatest PG if you simply want your PG to handle and distribute. he was amazing at that. but if you want that and more you get isiah.

i take isiah each and every time.

Zeke

silly

You probably came here for the advanced statistical point of view, though, so here it is: Stockton had 205.4 career Win Shares (3rd all-time) in 19 years, for an average of 10.8 per season; per 3000 minutes, Stockton generated 12.9 wins for the Jazz over the course of his career. Eight times he finished in the league’s top 5 in Win Shares, his career offensive rating of 120.5 (which he accomplished while taking on 21.9% of Utah’s possessions when on the floor) ranks 4th in NBA history, and he had a career DRtg of 104.0 in an era where the league’s average was 106.7. By contrast, Thomas’s 80.3 career Win Shares ranks 88th all-time, and he averaged 6.2 per season; his career WS/3000 min. mark is 6.8. Only once (1984-85) did Isiah finish in the top 5 in WS, and he had a career ORtg of 106.3 and a DRtg of 106.8 in an era where the league’s average was 107.5. The only facets of the game where Isiah was superior to Stockton were his shot-creating ability (Thomas did take on 26.5% of Detroit’s possessions while on the court) and his rebounding (Thomas’ 5.3 career rebound rate is marginally better than Stockton’s 5.0), but in every other area — TS%, assist ratio, steal rate, etc. — Stockton kills Isiah in terms of regular-season numbers.


Where is that "famous" quote I posted about using stats like a drunk man uses lamposts?

I could rave on about why Thomas is superior but it's pointless. Anyone that believes Stockton should be ranked above Zeke is too far gone for you to reach.

If GM's had a choice between them, knowing all that they know now you can bet your left nut that Thomas would be the pick.

It's not all about the championships, but they matter.

BTW, I noticed that Conference Finals are not mentioned. Why is that?

Would would do a better job running the CBA or an NBA franchise?

Hypothetically, of course.

These are the kind of bullshit arguments you can find today on the Internet. Some 20 something stat geek with a love to argue moronic crap throws out some numbers and gets to say, "Hey, at least it's not so cut and dry."

Well dipshit, talk to anyone, anyone, who watched the NBA in the 80's and not one person would objectively EVER take Stockton over Zeke. Oh, and nice try with the number of rings argument but no dice. See there's a difference between hitting a few threes for a championship team (granted one still hurts me every time I think about it) and being the heart, driving force and best player on a championship team.

This is one of the very first Bill Simmons column I ever read. It's what actually started my reading his stuff (though I don't read him that much at all anymore): http://proxy.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?id=1245830

He's wrong at the end though, it was Rodman who actually said the line.


CTGBIGGS ASKS: What is the greatest injustice in sports history? This came to mind this morning as I was driving to work. I heard "Devil Went Down To Georgia" by Charlie Daniels. Everyone knows this was the greatest injustice in music history -- no way Johnny outfiddled the Devil. The Devil had a much better riff.

Sports Guy: Well said. As for the greatest sports injustice of all-time -- as much as I hate to admit it -- it happened when Isiah Thomas was left off the original Dream Team in the '92 Olympics (in lieu of John Stockton).

Granted, Michael Jordan (allegedly) refused to play unless Isiah wasn't there, and Stockton's skin color probably helped, and Isiah could have crippled team chemistry (being a little backstabbing weasel and all). But this team was supposed to celebrate the superstars of the '80s and the rising stars of the '90s. Looking back, Isiah had to make the team, if only because he was the fourth-biggest superstar during the '80s (the watershed decade in NBA history).

Compare his career to Magic Johnson's career: Magic won five rings, but he also played with two Hall of Famers (Worthy and Kareem) and a number of accomplished role players (Wilkes, Nixon, Cooper, Scott, etc.). Only during the '87 and '88 title seasons -- when Kareem was losing it -- did Magic unquestionably emerge as the MVP on his own team. Don't let anyone tell you differently. And please don't forget the fact that you couldn't hide Magic defensively.

Meanwhile, Isiah played with one second-tier All-Star (Dumars) and an eclectic mix of role players ... yet his Pistons teams netted two titles and should have won a third (in '88). And Isiah was Detroit's GTG (go-to guy) for his entire career -- he didn't have the luxury of dumping it to Kareem for an automatic deuce. And while we're at it, nobody ran a basketball team better than Isiah; I'll go to my grave believing that. He was the best pure point guard of my lifetime.

Here's my point: You could at least debate the "Magic vs. Isiah" argument. But there wasn't a single moment in John Stockton's career -- I mean, ever -- when he was better than Isiah Thomas. Isiah deserved to make that team. Case closed.

(I can't believe I just spent five paragraphs defending Isiah Thomas, the same man who once claimed that Larry Bird would be "just another good player" if The Man were black. Blasphemer! Let's just move on ...)

Did anybody see they had the top 10 PGs rated on ESPN.com? Zeke was third after Magic and the Big O. Although Hollinger put him at like 9th or 10th after Gary Payton and Steve Nash.

Ocb4MFkDiAY

Thread over. Winner Zeke.

did i hear correctly? stockton chose isiah to be his presenter at his hall of fame induction...?

since when did they become so tight?

I thought LeBron James introduced everyone into the HOF these days.

Seriously, I'm surprised that Stockton didn't pick Adrian Dantley.

I think it says something that he didn't pick Karl Malone.

What that something is, I'm not quite sure.

That he's a racist.

Maybe he's pissed about him running of to LA trying to be a ring whore.

That he's a racist.

wait, Zeke is white?

Maybe he doesn't like Mexican girls?

wait, Zeke is white?

That was the joke.

Sloan picked Barkley to induct him?

WTF is going on here?

I think it says something that he didn't pick Karl Malone.

What that something is, I'm not quite sure.
It says that he's following the HOF rules/traditions where the person giving your HOF intro must be in the HOF themselves. Malone's not inducted yet.

As for Jerry Sloan, logically one of his teammates from when he was a player would do the honors... it's a crime that Chet Walker (Benton Harbor's finest) isn't in the HOF.