WTFDetroit.com

View Full Version : Plastic bastards



Uncle Mxy
05-29-2008, 08:14 AM
http://news.therecord.com/article/354044

Getting ordinary plastic bags to rot away like banana peels would be an environmental dream come true.

After all, we produce 500 billion a year worldwide and they take up to 1,000 years to decompose. They take up space in landfills, litter our streets and parks, pollute the oceans and kill the animals that eat them.

Now a Waterloo teenager has found a way to make plastic bags degrade faster -- in three months, he figures.

Daniel Burd's project won the top prize at the Canada-Wide Science Fair in Ottawa. He came back with a long list of awards, including a $10,000 prize, a $20,000 scholarship, and recognition that he has found a practical way to help the environment.

Daniel, a 16-year-old Grade 11 student at Waterloo Collegiate Institute, got the idea for his project from everyday life.

"Almost every week I have to do chores and when I open the closet door, I have this avalanche of plastic bags falling on top of me," he said. "One day, I got tired of it and I wanted to know what other people are doing with these plastic bags."

The answer: not much. So he decided to do something himself.

He knew plastic does eventually degrade, and figured microorganisms must be behind it. His goal was to isolate the microorganisms that can break down plastic -- not an easy task because they don't exist in high numbers in nature.

First, he ground plastic bags into a powder. Next, he used ordinary household chemicals, yeast and tap water to create a solution that would encourage microbe growth. To that, he added the plastic powder and dirt. Then the solution sat in a shaker at 30 degrees.

After three months of upping the concentration of plastic-eating microbes, Burd filtered out the remaining plastic powder and put his bacterial culture into three flasks with strips of plastic cut from grocery bags. As a control, he also added plastic to flasks containing boiled and therefore dead bacterial culture.

Six weeks later, he weighed the strips of plastic. The control strips were the same. But the ones that had been in the live bacterial culture weighed an average of 17 per cent less.

That wasn't good enough for Burd. To identify the bacteria in his culture, he let them grow on agar plates and found he had four types of microbes. He tested those on more plastic strips and found only the second was capable of significant plastic degradation.

Next, Burd tried mixing his most effective strain with the others. He found strains one and two together produced a 32 per cent weight loss in his plastic strips. His theory is strain one helps strain two reproduce.

Tests to identify the strains found strain two was Sphingomonas bacteria and the helper was Pseudomonas.

A researcher in Ireland has found Pseudomonas is capable of degrading polystyrene, but as far as Burd and his teacher Mark Menhennet know -- and they've looked -- Burd's research on polyethelene plastic bags is a first.

Next, Burd tested his strains' effectiveness at different temperatures, concentrations and with the addition of sodium acetate as a ready source of carbon to help bacteria grow.

At 37 degrees and optimal bacterial concentration, with a bit of sodium acetate thrown in, Burd achieved 43 per cent degradation within six weeks.

The plastic he fished out then was visibly clearer and more brittle, and Burd guesses after six more weeks, it would be gone. He hasn't tried that yet.

To see if his process would work on a larger scale, he tried it with five or six whole bags in a bucket with the bacterial culture. That worked too.

Industrial application should be easy, said Burd. "All you need is a fermenter . . . your growth medium, your microbes and your plastic bags."

The inputs are cheap, maintaining the required temperature takes little energy because microbes produce heat as they work, and the only outputs are water and tiny levels of carbon dioxide -- each microbe produces only 0.01 per cent of its own infinitesimal weight in carbon dioxide, said Burd.

"This is a huge, huge step forward . . . We're using nature to solve a man-made problem."

Burd would like to take his project further and see it be used. He plans to study science at university, but in the meantime he's busy with things such as student council, sports and music.

"Dan is definitely a talented student all around and is poised to be a leading scientist in our community," said Menhennet, who led the school's science fair team but says he only helped Burd with paperwork.

Wizzle
05-29-2008, 08:50 AM
I love it when a 16 year old is smarter than I'll ever be.

Good for him.

Big Swami
05-29-2008, 09:03 AM
Doesn't it bother anyone else when they read an article like that? I start thinking...you know how we have all these premier scientists who work for top-notch universities, chemical corporations, and government agencies? Why are they so asleep at the switch that some high school kid - from Canada, no less - is solving one of the major environmental issues of the modern age?

There is a floating island of polyethylene in the Pacific Ocean right now that is almost as big as the continental United States. And a high school kid from Canada is the one figuring out how to make it go away? Who is in charge here?

WTFchris
05-29-2008, 11:44 AM
^good point Swami. I'm not sure why this couldn't have been discovered earlier.

Still, great story from the kid's standpoint. Good for him. Hopefully this is implemented and not set aside for political reasons. You'd think this country would be interested in saving the planet, but most of the country is only interested if it doesn't inconvenince them. We don't even have a deposit on soda cans here, which means very few are recycled.

Tahoe
05-29-2008, 01:34 PM
It's prolly a matter of there is no money in figuring out an answer to the problem. So status quo wins out.

99% of the companies in the US FEAR CHANGE, imo.

Big Swami
05-29-2008, 01:53 PM
It's prolly a matter of there is no money in figuring out and answer to the problem. So status quo wins out.

99% of the companies in the US FEAR CHANGE, imo.
They fear change for a good reason. Change by definition puts power and money in the hands of different people, and business is constantly fighting to increase the amount of money going to the same people.

DE
05-29-2008, 02:19 PM
Tahoe, Swami:

:cogent:

Uncle Mxy
05-29-2008, 03:18 PM
I think one big difference is the news reporting.

The story I grabbed was from a newspaper in Waterloo with a circulation of 70,000 or so -- not a science magazine or anything like that. Note that there's more honest-to-goodness scientific process in there than I see in newspapers and TV soundbites. Depending on specialization, yeah, it can sometimes be hard to pigeonhole some breakthroughs into newspaper writeups. But if we get so caught up in your field that we can't readily communicate at least a few of the specifics with others, we're not going to inspire that interest in others. We routinely see science reported in fuzzy and largely-unknowable terms, and bemoan when less people want to know it.